Literature DB >> 9348695

Acoustic correlates of English and French nasalized vowels.

M Y Chen1.   

Abstract

Acoustic analysis of nasalized vowels in the frequency domain indicates the presence of extra peaks: one between the first two formants with amplitude P1 and one at lower frequencies, often below the first formant, with amplitude P0. The first-formant amplitude A1 is also reduced relative to its amplitude for an oral vowel. These acoustic characteristics can be explained by speech production theory. The objective of this study was to determine the values for the acoustic correlates A1-P1 and A1-P0 (dB) for quantifying nasalization. They were tested as measures of nasalization by comparing vowels between nasal consonants and those between stop consonants for English speakers. Also, portions of nasal vowels following a stop consonant were compared for speakers of French, which makes a linguistic distinction between oral and nasal vowels. In the analysis of English, the mean difference of A1-P1 measured in oral vowels and nasalized vowels had a range of 10 dB-15 dB; the difference of A1-P0 had a range of 6 dB-8 dB. In the study of French, the difference of A1-P1 measured between the least-nasalized portion and the most-nasalized portion of the vowel had a range of 9 dB-12 dB; for A1-P0, the difference ranged between 3 dB and 9 dB. In order to obtain an absolute acoustic measure of nasalization that was independent of vowel type, normalized parameters were calculated by adjusting for the influence of the vowel formant frequencies.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9348695     DOI: 10.1121/1.419620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Vocal tract resonances in speech, singing, and playing musical instruments.

Authors:  Joe Wolfe; Maëva Garnier; John Smith
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2008-12-03

2.  Evidence against interactive effects on articulation in Javanese verb paradigms.

Authors:  Scott Seyfarth; Jozina Vander Klok; Marc Garellek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

3.  Robust Estimation of Hypernasality in Dysarthria with Acoustic Model Likelihood Features.

Authors:  Michael Saxon; Ayush Tripathi; Yishan Jiao; Julie Liss; Visar Berisha
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-08-07

4.  The use of automatic speech recognition showing the influence of nasality on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  S Mayr; K Burkhardt; M Schuster; K Rogler; A Maier; H Iro
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Oral configurations during vowel nasalization in English.

Authors:  Gabriel J Cler; Joseph S Perkell; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Co-Occurrence of Hypernasality and Voice Impairment in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Acoustic Quantification.

Authors:  Marziye Eshghi; Kathryn P Connaghan; Sarah E Gutz; James D Berry; Yana Yunusova; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.674

7.  Resonance Effects and the Vocalization of Speech.

Authors:  Brad Rakerd; Eric J Hunter; Peter Lapine
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2019-12-05

Review 8.  Static measurements of vowel formant frequencies and bandwidths: A review.

Authors:  Raymond D Kent; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  The Impact of Nasalance on Cepstral Peak Prominence and Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio.

Authors:  Catherine Madill; Duong Duy Nguyen; Kristie Yick-Ning Cham; Daniel Novakovic; Patricia McCabe
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 3.325

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.