Literature DB >> 9348673

The influence of different timbre attributes on the perceptual segregation of complex-tone sequences.

P G Singh1, A S Bregman.   

Abstract

Spectral factors such as differences in harmonic content are powerful cues in the perceptual organization of tone sequences. Temporal features such as rise time, however, have been shown to be poor cues [W. M. Hartmann and D. Johnson, Mus. Perc. 9, 155-184 (1991)]. The relative influence of these timbral features on perceptual segregation was investigated. Complex tones were sequenced in a repeating ABA- "gallop" format, under four conditions in which tones A and B had the same or different timbres as defined by differences in numbers of harmonics and temporal-envelope features. A sequence started with A and B tones at the same F0. The F0 difference between A and B then increased over the course of a trial, until a listener terminated the trial indicating perceptual segregation into sub-sequences comprising A and B tones, respectively. The F0 difference required to reach this crossover point of segregation provided a measure of the efficacy of stimulus features of A and B as cues for perceptual organization. Sequences combining differences in harmonic structure and temporal envelope required the smallest F0 change for segregation. Sequences of tones with the same harmonic structure and temporal envelope required larger changes in F0, while the other conditions fell in the middle of this range. The F0-tracking method used in this study facilitates measurement of the relative contribution of different stimulus features to stream segregation. It also holds potential as a tool using the point of segregation as a measure of the magnitude of timbre differences brought about by different physical features of sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9348673     DOI: 10.1121/1.419688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Infants use onset asynchrony cues in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stream segregation on a single electrode as a function of pulse rate in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Sara I Duran; Leslie M Collins; Chandra S Throckmorton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of spectral smearing on the perceptual segregation of vowel sequences.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Properties of auditory stream formation.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Hedwig E Gockel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Neuronal Correlates of Auditory Streaming in Monkey Auditory Cortex for Tone Sequences without Spectral Differences.

Authors:  Stanislava Knyazeva; Elena Selezneva; Alexander Gorkin; Nikolaos C Aggelopoulos; Michael Brosch
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-30

6.  The Impact of Pitch and Timbre Cues on Auditory Grouping and Stream Segregation.

Authors:  Yonghee Oh; Jillian C Zuwala; Caitlin M Salvagno; Grace A Tilbrook
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Auditory stream segregation using amplitude modulated bandpass noise.

Authors:  Yingjiu Nie; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-07

8.  Auditory stream segregation using bandpass noises: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Yingjiu Nie; Yang Zhang; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  The Role of Temporal Cues in Voluntary Stream Segregation for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Andreu Paredes-Gallardo; Sara M K Madsen; Torsten Dau; Jeremy Marozeau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.