Literature DB >> 9348070

Root cause analysis of laboratory delays to an emergency department.

C M Fernandes1, R Walker, A Price, J Marsden, L Haley.   

Abstract

The Q-Probes study has identified benchmark interinstitutional laboratory median turnaround times (TAT) of 25 min for hemoglobin and 36 min for potassium. Our objectives were to measure the emergency department (ED)/laboratory TAT and other relevant laboratory processing and reporting times, and to identify root causes of laboratory delay. A flow chart was developed for the ordering, collecting, analyzing, and reporting of laboratory results. Time intervals were prospectively recorded for complete blood count (CBC) and K+ in a cross-sectional study, using the flow chart, and defined as follows: TAT was the interval from blood draw (BD) to ED report; BD time was the interval from order processing to BD; and order processing time was the interval from physician ordering to the unit coordinator processing the orders. Median times with interquartile ranges are reported. CBC TAT was 38 min (29-51.5), and K+ TAT 58 min (45-76.5). Order processing time was 7 min (4-15). The laboratory assistant BD time was 17 min (8-30) for CBC and 15 min (7.75-32.25) for K+ as compared to 0 min for a nurse, yet the venipuncture method (laboratory assistant technique) had a recollection rate of 1% (1/93) due to hemolysis vs. 20% (19/95) via the i.v. catheter (nurse technique). Of stat ED blood work, 24% was for admitted patients held in the ED. Laboratory reporting times are delayed with these root causes: laboratory assistant availability; recollection rate; volume of tests for ED admitted patients; and order processing time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9348070     DOI: 10.1016/s0736-4679(97)00158-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  4 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood sample hemolysis in EDs: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Heyer; James H Derzon; Linda Winges; Colleen Shaw; Diana Mass; Susan R Snyder; Paul Epner; James H Nichols; Julie A Gayken; Dennis Ernst; Edward B Liebow
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.281

2.  Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study.

Authors:  P Morelli; E Porazzi; M Ruspini; U Restelli; G Banfi
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2013-06

3.  Captivating a captive audience: a quality improvement project increasing participation in intradialytic exercise across five renal dialysis units.

Authors:  Lyndsey Abdulnassir; Sara Egas-Kitchener; Daniel Whibley; Tom Fynmore; Gareth D Jones
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2017-03-15

4.  Comparison of patient flow and provider efficiency of two delivery strategies for HPV-based cervical cancer screening in Western Kenya: a time and motion study.

Authors:  Easter Olwanda; Jennifer Shen; James G Kahn; Katelyn Bryant-Comstock; Megan J Huchko
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.