Literature DB >> 9347976

Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid.

A J Boon1, J T Tans, E J Delwel, S M Egeler-Peerdeman, P W Hanlo, H A Wurzer, C J Avezaat, D A de Jong, R H Gooskens, J Hermans.   

Abstract

The authors examined whether measurement of resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid (Rcsf) predicts outcome after shunting for patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). In four centers 101 patients (most of whom had idiopathic NPH) who fulfilled strict entry criteria underwent shunt placement irrespective of their level of Rcsf obtained by lumbar constant flow infusion. Gait disturbance and dementia were quantified by using an NPH scale and the patient's level of disability was assessed by using the modified Rankin scale (mRS). In addition the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination was performed. Patients were assessed prior to and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery. Primary outcome measures were based on differences between the preoperative and last NPH scale scores and mRS grades. Improvement was defined as a change measuring at least 15% in the NPH scale score and at least one mRS grade. Intention-to-treat analysis of all patients at 1 year yielded improvement for 57% in NPH scale score and 59% in mRS grade. Efficacy analysis, excluding serious events and deaths that were unrelated to NPH, was performed for 95 patients. Improvement rose to 76% in NPH scale score and 69% in mRS grade. Six cut-off levels of Rcsf were related to improvement in NPH scale score using two-by-two tables. Positive predictive values were approximately 80% for an Rcsf of 10, 12, or 15 mm Hg/ml/minute, 92% for an Rcsf of 18 mm Hg/ml/minute, and 100% for an Rcsf of 24 mm Hg/ml/minute. Negative predictive values were low. More important was the highest likelihood ratio of 3.5 for an Rcsf of 18 mm Hg/ml/minute. Extensive comorbidity was a major prognostic factor. Measurement of Rcsf reliably predicts outcome if the limit for shunting is raised to 18 mm Hg/ml/minute. At lower Rcsf values the decision depends mainly on the extent to which clinical and computerized tomography findings are typical of NPH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9347976     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.5.0687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  41 in total

1.  Hydrocephalus and shunts: what the neurologist should know.

Authors:  Ian K Pople
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Features of the Sinushunt and its influence on the cerebrospinal fluid system.

Authors:  A Eklund; L-O D Koskinen; J Malm
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 3.  A review of cognitive impairment and differential diagnosis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Marta Picascia; Roberta Zangaglia; Sara Bernini; Brigida Minafra; Elena Sinforiani; Claudio Pacchetti
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

Review 4.  The differential diagnosis and treatment of normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Michael Kiefer; Andreas Unterberg
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: clinical comorbidity correlated with cerebral biopsy findings and outcome of cerebrospinal fluid shunting.

Authors:  R Bech-Azeddine; P Høgh; M Juhler; F Gjerris; G Waldemar
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Intracranial compartment volumes in normal pressure hydrocephalus: volumetric assessment versus outcome.

Authors:  W M Palm; R Walchenbach; B Bruinsma; F Admiraal-Behloul; H A M Middelkoop; L J Launer; J van der Grond; M A van Buchem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  CSF proteomic analysis in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus selected for the shunt: CSF biomarkers of response to surgical treatment.

Authors:  Antonio Scollato; Alessandro Terreni; Anna Caldini; Benedetta Salvadori; Pasquale Gallina; Simona Francese; Guido Mastrobuoni; Giuseppe Pieraccini; Gloriano Moneti; Luca Bini; Gianni Messeri; Nicola Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Clinical Correlation of Abnormal Findings on Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Avital Perry; Christopher S Graffeo; Nikoo Fattahi; Mona M ElSheikh; Nealey Cray; Arvin Arani; Richard L Ehman; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Fredric B Meyer; John Huston
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure amplitude during lumbar infusion in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus can predict response to shunting.

Authors:  Per K Eide; Are Brean
Journal:  Cerebrospinal Fluid Res       Date:  2010-02-12

10.  Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Masaaki Hashimoto; Masatsune Ishikawa; Etsuro Mori; Nobumasa Kuwana
Journal:  Cerebrospinal Fluid Res       Date:  2010-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.