Literature DB >> 16418361

Intracranial compartment volumes in normal pressure hydrocephalus: volumetric assessment versus outcome.

W M Palm1, R Walchenbach, B Bruinsma, F Admiraal-Behloul, H A M Middelkoop, L J Launer, J van der Grond, M A van Buchem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Although enlargement of the cerebral ventricles plays a central role in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), there are no reports on the use of volumetric assessment to distinguish between patients who respond to ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery and those who do not. The purpose of this study is to explore the association between preoperative intracranial compartment volumes and postoperative improvement.
METHODS: Twenty-six patients (17 men; mean age, 75 years [range, 54-87 years]) with a clinical or radiologic suspicion of NPH were included in the study. Gait, cognition, and bladder function were evaluated by clinical rating. MR imaging of the brain was acquired at 0.5 T and 1.5 T. Total intracranial volume, ventricular volume, brain volume, and pericerebral CSF volume were determined by volumetric assessment. Four imaging variables were determined: ventricular volume ratio, brain volume ratio, pericerebral CSF volume ratio, and the ratio of ventricular volume to pericerebral CSF volume. All patients underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery.
RESULTS: Clinical follow-up was assessed 1 year after shunt surgery. No difference in the mean ventricular volume ratio, the mean brain volume ratio, the mean pericerebral CSF volume ratio, and the mean ratio between ventricular and pericerebral CSF volume was found between subjects who improved on gait or cognition or bladder function and those who did not.
CONCLUSION: Volumetric assessment has no predictive value in differentiating between NPH patients who respond to ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery and those who do not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16418361      PMCID: PMC7976091     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  30 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  J A Vanneste
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  SYMPTOMATIC OCCULT HYDROCEPHALUS WITH "NORMAL" CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID PRESSURE.A TREATABLE SYNDROME.

Authors:  R D ADAMS; C M FISHER; S HAKIM; R G OJEMANN; W H SWEET
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1965-07-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Use of long-term intracranial pressure measurement to assess hydrocephalic patients prior to shunt surgery.

Authors:  L Symon; N W Dorsch
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Marked cerebrospinal fluid void: indicator of successful shunt in patients with suspected normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  W G Bradley; A R Whittemore; K E Kortman; A S Watanabe; M Homyak; L M Teresi; S J Davis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The value of temporary external lumbar CSF drainage in predicting the outcome of shunting on normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  R Walchenbach; E Geiger; R T W M Thomeer; J A L Vanneste
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  The predictive value of 5 days CSF diversion for shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  L Di Lauro; M Mearini; A Bollati
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Is the placement of shunts in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus worth the risk? Results of a study based on continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Maria A Poca; Maria Mataró; Maria Del Mar Matarín; Fuat Arikan; Carmen Junqué; Juan Sahuquillo
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging.

Authors:  W G Bradley; D Scalzo; J Queralt; W N Nitz; D J Atkinson; P Wong
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Differential diagnosis of NPH and brain atrophy assessed by measurement of intracranial and ventricular CSF volume with 3D FASE MRI.

Authors:  M Yoshihara; A Tsunoda; K Sato; S Kanayama; A Calderon
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  1998

10.  Use of magnetic resonance imaging to measure intracranial cerebrospinal fluid volume.

Authors:  B Condon; J Patterson; D Wyper; D Hadley; R Grant; G Teasdale; J Rowan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-14       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  15 in total

1.  Intracranial cerebrospinal fluid spaces imaging using a pulse-triggered three-dimensional turbo spin echo MR sequence with variable flip-angle distribution.

Authors:  Jérôme Hodel; Jonathan Silvera; Olivier Bekaert; Alain Rahmouni; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin; Alexandre Vignaud; Eric Petit; Bruno Durning; Philippe Decq
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  MR imaging of brain volumes: evaluation of a fully automatic software.

Authors:  K Ambarki; A Wåhlin; R Birgander; A Eklund; J Malm
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Structural volumetry in NPH diagnostics and treatment-future or dead end?

Authors:  Aleš Vlasák; Petr Skalický; Arnošt Mládek; Jiří Vrána; Vladimír Beneš; Ondřej Bradáč
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Diagnosis of Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus: Use of Traditional Measures in the Era of Volumetric MR Imaging.

Authors:  Nityanand Miskin; Hersh Patel; Ana M Franceschi; Benjamin Ades-Aron; Alexander Le; Brianna E Damadian; Christian Stanton; Yafell Serulle; James Golomb; Oded Gonen; Henry Rusinek; Ajax E George
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Olfactory bulb volume in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Dino Podlesek; Mario Leimert; Benno Schuster; Johannes Gerber; Gabriele Schackert; Matthias Kirsch; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  The topology of ventricle surfaces and its application in the analysis of hydrocephalic ventricles: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Yu Tung Lo; Sumeet Kumar; Leanne Qiaojing Tan; Christine Lock; Nicole Chwee Har Keong
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Correlating magnetic resonance findings with neuropathology and clinical signs in dogs and cats.

Authors:  Charles H Vite; Johnny R Cross
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.363

8.  The First Examination of Diagnostic Performance of Automated Measurement of the Callosal Angle in 1856 Elderly Patients and Volunteers Indicates That 12.4% of Exams Met the Criteria for Possible Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  M Borzage; A Saunders; J Hughes; J G McComb; S Blüml; K S King
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  David Shprecher; Jason Schwalb; Roger Kurlan
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.081

10.  A stereotaxic, population-averaged T1w ovine brain atlas including cerebral morphology and tissue volumes.

Authors:  Björn Nitzsche; Stephen Frey; Louis D Collins; Johannes Seeger; Donald Lobsien; Antje Dreyer; Holger Kirsten; Michael H Stoffel; Vladimir S Fonov; Johannes Boltze
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.856

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.