Literature DB >> 9347473

Comparison of lower oesophageal sphincter pressure measurement using circumferential vs unidirectional transducers.

K G Pursnani1, C Oeffner, R M Gideon, D O Castell.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Average values from unidirectional (UND) transducers have traditionally been used in standard manometric evaluation of lower oesophageal sphincter pressures (LOSPs). A single circumferential (CMF) transducer has recently become popular. Our aim was to compare LOSP measurements made using the two techniques. Ten healthy volunteers were intubated with a Konigsberg manometry catheter containing five solid-state transducers (four unidirectional at 90 degrees angles radially and 2.5-cm intervals and one circumferential, 3 cm distal). LOSP was measured using the station pull-through technique in the supine and upright positions with Synectics Polygram software for computerized analysis. Mean UND pressures were plotted against CMF pressures and a linear regression and correlation analysis was performed. A similar analysis was done for LOS length. A significant difference (P < 0.01) was found between mean (+/- SE) supine and upright LOSPs for both mean UND (20.21 +/- 1.36 vs 15.56 +/- 1.28 mmHg) and CMF (20.41 +/- 1.96 vs 16.17 +/- 1.61 mmHg); however no difference was shown between supine and upright lengths. There was a high degree of correlation between LOSP (r = 0.83) and a weaker correlation (r = 0.65) between LOS lengths when measured by CMF and UND transducers.
CONCLUSION: UND and CMF transducers provide identical measurements when evaluating the LOS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9347473     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2982.1997.d01-40.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of air-coupled balloon esophageal and anorectal manometry catheters with solid-state esophageal manometry and water-perfused anorectal manometry catheters.

Authors:  John C Fang; Kristen Hilden; Ashok K Tuteja; Kathryn A Peterson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Comparison of unidirectional and circumferential manometric measures within the pharyngoesophageal segment: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Esther Guiu Hernandez; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Richard Jones; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A comparative study of 22-channel water-perfusion system and solid-state system with 36-sensors in esophageal manometery.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Li-Ping Duan; Ying Ge; Zhi-Wei Xia; Zhi-Jie Xu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.067

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.