Literature DB >> 9346641

Effect of orthotopic liver transplantation on employment and health status.

C M Hunt1, J S Tart, E Dowdy, B P Bute, D M Williams, P A Clavien.   

Abstract

Employment, functional status, health status, and prevalence of anxiety and depression were assessed in patients who had undergone orthotopic liver transplantation at Duke University from 1984 to 1993 to identify social and economic factors that might influence return to work after liver transplantation. Patients were asked to complete mailed questionnaires. A transplant nurse coordinator assigned patients a Karnofsky score, unaware of the questionnaire responses. The response rate was 71% (52 of 72 patients). The median age of the post-liver transplantation patients was 49 years. Median years of education were 13. Sixty-five percent of patients were male. Sixty percent of patients were employed posttransplantation. Employed and unemployed posttransplantation patients showed no significant difference in age, education, gender, marital status, race, family coping skills, or cause of liver disease. Return to work after transplantation did not correlate with socioeconomic status or spouse's employment. Posttransplantation return to work was highly correlated with pretransplant employment (P < .0005). The prevalence of anxiety and depression, assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), was 9% and was no different in the employed or unemployed patients. Health status, as measured by Karnofsky score, was excellent; all patients received Karnofsky scores > or = 80%. Health perceptions were compared in employed versus unemployed posttransplantation patients with the SF-36, a 36-item short form survey developed by the investigators of the Medical Outcome Study. This revealed significantly different values in the subscale, physical functioning, with a mean score of 70.6 in the employed and a mean score of 48.4 in the unemployed posttransplantation patients (P = .004) and role-physical with a mean score of 61.8 in the employed and a mean score of 27.6 in the unemployed posttransplantation patients (P = .005). Eighty percent of patients not returning to work cited "problems with their health" as their major obstacle to employment. Although objective health status was good to excellent in all patients after transplantation, patients perceived that their health status was poor, with the lowest scores observed in unemployed posttransplantation patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9346641     DOI: 10.1002/lt.500020211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl Surg        ISSN: 1074-3022


  11 in total

1.  Societal reintegration following cadaveric orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ryan Kelly; Scott Hurton; Subhashini Ayloo; Mathew Cwinn; Sarah De Coutere-Bosse; Michele Molinari
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Predictors of Return to Work 12 Months After Solid Organ Transplantation: Results from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study.

Authors:  Laure Vieux; Amira A Simcox; Zakia Mediouni; Pascal Wild; Michael Koller; Regina K Studer; Brigitta Danuser
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2019-06

Review 3.  Medical problems occurring after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  K L Carson; C M Hunt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Health-related quality of life following liver transplantation.

Authors:  S Bryan; J Ratcliffe; J M Neuberger; A K Burroughs; B K Gunson; M J Buxton
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Societal reintegration after liver transplantation: findings in alcohol-related and non-alcohol-related transplant recipients.

Authors:  Terianne Cowling; Linda W Jennings; Robert M Goldstein; Edmund Q Sanchez; Srinath Chinnakotla; Goran B Klintmalm; Marlon F Levy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The effects of physical quality of life, time, and gender on change in symptoms of anxiety and depression after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Robert T Russell; Irene D Feurer; Panarut Wisawatapnimit; Ronald M Salomon; C Wright Pinson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Liver transplant candidacy unsuitability: a review of the British Columbia experience.

Authors:  Jaber Alali; Alnoor Ramji; Jin K Ho; Charles H Scudamore; Siegfried R Erb; Elsie Cheung; Bina Kopit; Clare A Bannon; Stephen W Chung; John G Soos; Andrezj K Buczkowski; Eileen M Brooks; Urs P Steinbrecher; Eric M Yoshida
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 8.  Care of the liver transplant patient.

Authors:  Mamatha Bhat; Said Al-Busafi; Marc Deschênes; Peter Ghali
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-04

9.  Quality of life in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: baseline data from the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis clinical research network.

Authors:  Kristin David; Kris V Kowdley; Aynur Unalp; Fasiha Kanwal; Elizabeth M Brunt; Jeffrey B Schwimmer
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Leisure time physical activity and health-related behaviours after liver transplantation: a prospective, single-centre study.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kotarska; Ewa Wunsch; Joanna Raszeja-Wyszomirska; Agnieszka Kempińska-Podhorodecka; Maciej Wójcicki; Piotr Milkiewicz
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.