Literature DB >> 16482235

Liver transplant candidacy unsuitability: a review of the British Columbia experience.

Jaber Alali1, Alnoor Ramji, Jin K Ho, Charles H Scudamore, Siegfried R Erb, Elsie Cheung, Bina Kopit, Clare A Bannon, Stephen W Chung, John G Soos, Andrezj K Buczkowski, Eileen M Brooks, Urs P Steinbrecher, Eric M Yoshida.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Every centre has contraindications to liver transplantation and declares patients unsuitable for medical or nonmedical reasons. To date, there has been no published review of any centre's experience.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed from 1997 to 2001, inclusive of all patients referred for liver transplant to the British Columbia Transplant Society who were declared unsuitable for transplantation, as well as the reasons for unsuitability.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were considered to be unsuitable for transplantation. During this period, 167 transplants were performed and 737 patients were referred for candidacy. Data were missing on three patients; analysis was performed on the remaining 147. Patients' ages ranged from 15 to 72 years, and 33.3% were female. The most common primary liver disease was hepatitis C (n=53, 35%), followed by alcoholic liver disease (n=35, 24%) and autoimmune liver diseases (n=23, 16%). Medical contraindications constituted 74 patients (49.0%) and the most common reasons for unsuitability were no need of a liver transplant (29 patients [39%]), exclusion due to hepatoma or extrahepatic malignancy (20 patients [27%]) and multisystem failure (12 patients [16%]). Nonmedical contraindications constituted 73 patients. Failure to meet minimal alcohol criteria comprised the largest group (n=39, 53.4%) followed by inadequate social support (n=12, 16.4%), failure to follow up medical assessment (n=10, 13.7%) and drug abuse (n=6, 8.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Although many patients were declined for transplantation, the proportion is relatively small compared with the number of referred patients. Nonmedical reasons, including failure to meet alcohol criteria and lack of social support, remain a significant reason for unsuitability in British Columbia. Community intervention before transplant referral is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16482235      PMCID: PMC2538970          DOI: 10.1155/2006/879103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0835-7900            Impact factor:   3.522


  13 in total

1.  Effect of orthotopic liver transplantation on employment and health status.

Authors:  C M Hunt; J S Tart; E Dowdy; B P Bute; D M Williams; P A Clavien
Journal:  Liver Transpl Surg       Date:  1996-03

Review 2.  Selecting candidates for liver transplantation: a medical ethics perspective on the microallocation of a scarce and rationed resource.

Authors:  E M Yoshida
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 3.  Liver transplantation. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Authors:  R L Carithers
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Survival and prognostic indicators in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis.

Authors:  G D'Amico; A Morabito; L Pagliaro; E Marubini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Outcomes following liver transplantation for patients with alcohol- versus nonalcohol-induced liver disease.

Authors:  D Abosh; B Rosser; K Kaita; R Bazylewski; G Minuk
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting versus paracentesis plus albumin for refractory ascites in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Pere Ginès; Juan Uriz; Blas Calahorra; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Patrick S Kamath; Luis Ruiz Del Arbol; Ramón Planas; Jaime Bosch; Vicente Arroyo; Juan Rodés
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  Selection of patients for liver transplantation in 1997 and beyond.

Authors:  E M Yoshida; J R Lake
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.126

8.  Long-term follow-up after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease under tacrolimus.

Authors:  A Jain; A DiMartini; R Kashyap; A Youk; S Rohal; J Fung
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Liver transplantation for patients with alcoholism and end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  R G Gish; A H Lee; E B Keeffe; H Rome; W Concepcion; C O Esquivel
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  V Mazzaferro; E Regalia; R Doci; S Andreola; A Pulvirenti; F Bozzetti; F Montalto; M Ammatuna; A Morabito; L Gennari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-03-14       Impact factor: 176.079

View more
  3 in total

1.  Predictors of relapse to significant alcohol drinking after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Zamil Karim; Pongphob Intaraprasong; Charles H Scudamore; Siegfried R Erb; John G Soos; Elsie Cheung; Polly Cooper; Andrzej K Buzckowski; Stephen W Chung; Urs P Steinbrecher; Eric M Yoshida
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Recipient ineligibility after liver transplantation assessment: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Aman Arya; Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro; Paul Marotta; Julia Uhanova; Natasha Chandok
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Being accompanied to liver discharge clinic: An easy measure to identify potential liver transplant candidates among those previously considered ineligible.

Authors:  Jordan Sack; Nilofar Najafian; Angela DeLisle; Simona Jakab
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2019-04-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.