Literature DB >> 9346535

Acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation: variability, morbidity, and mortality.

L R Fisher1, K S Henley, M R Lucey.   

Abstract

Acute cellular rejection of the allograft is a potentially serious complication after liver transplantation, yet its true incidence is unknown. We therefore investigated the frequency of acute cellular rejection reported by transplant centers and its impact on morbidity and mortality. Morbidity was defined as duration of hospitalization. Of 200 articles screened, 18 were selected for inclusion in the study database, in which there was a total of 1,437 patients who received transplants. All contained more than 20 patients and invariably used histopathology for diagnosis of acute cellular rejection. These reports included all transplant patients within a fixed period and sufficient data to determine the incidence of acute cellular rejection. Morbidity data were obtained from our previous series. The mean incidence of acute cellular rejection in all centers was 49.8% (range between centers, 24% to 80%). Two immunosuppressive cohorts were identified: high-dose cyclosporine induction (> or = 5 mg/kg/d) and low-dose cyclosporine induction (< or = 4 mg/kg/d). Acute cellular rejection was reported in 27.0% of the high-dose group and 63.6% of the low-dose group, P = .0001. Strict adherence to Snover's histological criteria for acute cellular rejection did not alter the reported mean incidence. Frequency of acute cellular rejection was 45.2% (range between centers, 24% to 80%) in 8 studies that used Snover's criteria, and 51.6% (range between centers, 37% to 80%) in 10 studies that did not. There was no correlation between mortality and incidence of acute cellular rejection in the 9 studies that reported survival (R2 = .105). Morbidity data showed that the average length of initial hospitalization after transplantation for patients with acute cellular rejection was 52.4 +/- 8.3 (range, 14 to 124) days, in contrast to 28.3 +/- 2.3 (range, 9 to 87) days for patients with no rejection. P = .0008. The total number of hospital days in the first 6 months for patients with acute cellular rejection was 55.6 +/- 8.6 (range, 14 to 124) days and with no rejection, was 37.7 +/- 3.1 (range, 9 to 99) days. P = .0232. The incidence of acute cellular rejection varies widely among transplant centers, regardless of the use of Snover's criteria. Acute cellular rejection appeared to be less frequent in programs using high-dose cyclosporine induction regimens. The presence of acute cellular rejection seemed to have no correlation with mortality but significantly increased morbidity and therefore the cost of transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9346535     DOI: 10.1002/lt.500010104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl Surg        ISSN: 1074-3022


  13 in total

Review 1.  Acute and Chronic Rejection After Liver Transplantation: What A Clinician Needs to Know.

Authors:  Narendra S Choudhary; Sanjiv Saigal; Rinkesh K Bansal; Neeraj Saraf; Dheeraj Gautam; Arvinder S Soin
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2017-11-07

2.  Anti-thymocyte globulin for the treatment of acute cellular rejection following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Timothy M Schmitt; Melissa Phillips; Robert G Sawyer; Patrick Northup; Klaus D Hagspiel; Timothy L Pruett; Hugo J R Bonatti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Differences in Phenotypes and Liver Transplantation Outcomes by Age Group in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

Authors:  Jacqueline B Henson; Yuval A Patel; Julius M Wilder; Jiayin Zheng; Shein-Chung Chow; Lindsay Y King; Andrew J Muir
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Acute Rejection Increases Risk of Graft Failure and Death in Recent Liver Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Josh Levitsky; David Goldberg; Abigail R Smith; Sarah A Mansfield; Brenda W Gillespie; Robert M Merion; Anna S F Lok; Gary Levy; Laura Kulik; Michael Abecassis; Abraham Shaked
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 5.  Single-agent immunosuppression after liver transplantation: what is possible?

Authors:  Maria L Raimondo; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Liver transplantation().

Authors:  M Rossi; G Mennini; Q Lai; S Ginanni Corradini; F M Drudi; F Pugliese; P B Berloco
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2007-04-16

7.  Histological and Clinicopathological Evaluation of Liver Allograft Biopsy: An Initial Experience of Fifty Six Biopsies.

Authors:  K V Kanodia; A V Vanikar; P R Modi; R D Patel; K S Suthar; L K Nigam; H L Trivedi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

Review 8.  Management of immunosuppressant agents following liver transplantation: Less is more.

Authors:  Mustafa S Ascha; Mona L Ascha; Ibrahim A Hanouneh
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-01-28

9.  Acute allograft rejection in liver transplant recipients: Incidence, risk factors, treatment success, and impact on graft failure.

Authors:  Nurettin Dogan; Anna Hüsing-Kabar; Hartmut H Schmidt; Vito R Cicinnati; Susanne Beckebaum; Iyad Kabar
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 10.  The immunoregulation of mesenchymal stem cells plays a critical role in improving the prognosis of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Chenxia Hu; Lanjuan Li
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.