Literature DB >> 9343393

Synergistic activation of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer by Sox2 and Oct-3 depends on protein-protein interactions facilitated by a specific spatial arrangement of factor binding sites.

D C Ambrosetti1, C Basilico, L Dailey.   

Abstract

Octamer binding and Sox factors are thought to play important roles in development by potentiating the transcriptional activation of specific gene subsets. The proteins within these factor families are related by the presence of highly conserved DNA binding domains, the octamer binding protein POU domain or the Sox factors HMG domain. We have previously shown that fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF-4) gene expression in embryonal carcinoma cells requires a synergistic interaction between Oct-3 and Sox2 on the FGF-4 enhancer. Sox2 and Oct-3 bind to adjacent sites within this enhancer to form a ternary protein-DNA complex (Oct-3*) whose assembly correlates with enhancer activity. We now demonstrate that increasing the distance between the octamer and Sox binding sites by base pair insertion results in a loss of enhancer function. Significantly, those enhancer "spacing mutants" which failed to activate transcription were also compromised in their ability to form the Oct* complexes even though they could still bind both Sox2 and the octamer binding proteins, suggesting that a direct interaction between Sox2 and Oct-3 is necessary for enhancer function. Consistent with this hypothesis, Oct-3 and Sox2 can participate in a direct protein-protein interaction in vitro in the absence of DNA, and both this interaction and assembly of the ternary Oct* complexes require only the octamer protein POU and Sox2 HMG domains. Assembly of the ternary complex by these two protein domains occurs in a cooperative manner on FGF-4 enhancer DNA, and the loss of this cooperative interaction contributes to the defect in Oct-3* formation observed for the enhancer spacing mutants. These observations indicate that Oct-3* assembly results from protein-protein interactions between the domains of Sox2 and Oct-3 that mediate their binding to DNA, but it also requires a specific arrangement of the binding sites within the FGF-4 enhancer DNA. Thus, these results define one parameter that is fundamental to synergistic activation by Sox2 and Oct-3 and further emphasize the critical role of enhancer DNA sequences in the proper assembly of functional activation complexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9343393      PMCID: PMC232483          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.17.11.6321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  44 in total

1.  The B cell coactivator Bob1 shows DNA sequence-dependent complex formation with Oct-1/Oct-2 factors, leading to differential promoter activation.

Authors:  M Gstaiger; O Georgiev; H van Leeuwen; P van der Vliet; W Schaffner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-06-03       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Promoter-selective activation domains in Oct-1 and Oct-2 direct differential activation of an snRNA and mRNA promoter.

Authors:  M Tanaka; J S Lai; W Herr
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-02-21       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins.

Authors:  R S Mann; S K Chan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Functional interaction between the POU domain protein Tst-1/Oct-6 and the high-mobility-group protein HMG-I/Y.

Authors:  H Leger; E Sock; K Renner; F Grummt; M Wegner
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  The carboxy-terminal transactivation domain of Oct-4 acquires cell specificity through the POU domain.

Authors:  A Brehm; K Ohbo; H Schöler
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Developmental-specific activity of the FGF-4 enhancer requires the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3.

Authors:  H Yuan; N Corbi; C Basilico; L Dailey
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Differential control of transcription by homologous homeodomain coregulators.

Authors:  C C Huang; W Herr
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  cDNA sequence of human transforming gene hst and identification of the coding sequence required for transforming activity.

Authors:  M Taira; T Yoshida; K Miyagawa; H Sakamoto; M Terada; T Sugimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Altered DNA recognition and bending by insertions in the alpha 2 tail of the yeast a1/alpha 2 homeodomain heterodimer.

Authors:  Y Jin; J Mead; T Li; C Wolberger; A K Vershon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Involvement of SOX proteins in lens-specific activation of crystallin genes.

Authors:  Y Kamachi; S Sockanathan; Q Liu; M Breitman; R Lovell-Badge; H Kondoh
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-07-17       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  129 in total

1.  Synergism with germ line transcription factor Oct-4: viral oncoproteins share the ability to mimic a stem cell-specific activity.

Authors:  A Brehm; K Ohbo; W Zwerschke; V Botquin; P Jansen-Dürr; H R Schöler
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Repression of Ets-2-induced transactivation of the tau interferon promoter by Oct-4.

Authors:  T Ezashi; D Ghosh; R M Roberts
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Pax6 and SOX2 form a co-DNA-binding partner complex that regulates initiation of lens development.

Authors:  Y Kamachi; M Uchikawa; A Tanouchi; R Sekido; H Kondoh
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Adjacent DNA sequences modulate Sox9 transcriptional activation at paired Sox sites in three chondrocyte-specific enhancer elements.

Authors:  Laura C Bridgewater; Marlan D Walker; Gwen C Miller; Trevor A Ellison; L Daniel Holsinger; Jennifer L Potter; Todd L Jackson; Reuben K Chen; Vicki L Winkel; Zhaoping Zhang; Sandra McKinney; Benoit de Crombrugghe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The human embryonic stem cell proteome revealed by multidimensional fractionation followed by tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Peng Zhao; Thomas C Schulz; Eric S Sherrer; D Brent Weatherly; Allan J Robins; Lance Wells
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Identification of Sox-2 regulatory region which is under the control of Oct-3/4-Sox-2 complex.

Authors:  Mizuho Tomioka; Masazumi Nishimoto; Satoru Miyagi; Tomoko Katayanagi; Nobutaka Fukui; Hitoshi Niwa; Masami Muramatsu; Akihiko Okuda
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Genetic and functional differences between multipotent neural and pluripotent embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Kevin A D'Amour; Fred H Gage
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Crystal structure of a POU/HMG/DNA ternary complex suggests differential assembly of Oct4 and Sox2 on two enhancers.

Authors:  Attila Reményi; Katharina Lins; L Johan Nissen; Rolland Reinbold; Hans R Schöler; Matthias Wilmanns
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  The Sox-2 regulatory regions display their activities in two distinct types of multipotent stem cells.

Authors:  Satoru Miyagi; Tetsuichiro Saito; Ken-ichi Mizutani; Norihisa Masuyama; Yukiko Gotoh; Atsushi Iwama; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Shinji Masui; Hitoshi Niwa; Masazumi Nishimoto; Masami Muramatsu; Akihiko Okuda
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Distinct functions of Sox2 control self-renewal and differentiation in the osteoblast lineage.

Authors:  Eunjeong Seo; Upal Basu-Roy; Jiri Zavadil; Claudio Basilico; Alka Mansukhani
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.