Literature DB >> 9341588

Renal chromophobe cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. A comparative morphologic, histochemical, and immunohistochemical study of 124 cases.

B Cochand-Priollet1, V Molinié, J Bougaran, R Bouvier, M C Dauge-Geffroy, S Deslignières, J C Fournet, P Gros, A Lesourd, J P Saint-André, M Toublanc, A Vieillefond, M Wassef, A Fontaine, L Groleau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renal oncocytoma has several features that overlap with other renal neoplasms, including the eosinophilic subtype of chromophobe cell carcinoma. In fact, strict criteria for renal oncocytoma have not been well defined and remain a matter of controversy. Ultrastructural studies or sophisticated methods such as flow cytometry and cytogenetic techniques can be of great use in distinguishing the two tumors, but are difficult to propose as routine methods because of their limited availability.
OBJECTIVE: To further characterize the histologic criteria of these tumors, we undertook a retrospective study to define the utility of routinely available histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Twenty-one cases of chromophobe cell carcinoma, eosinophilic subtype, and 103 cases of oncocytoma were tested with histochemical (Perls, periodic acid-Schiff, and Hale's colloidal iron) and immunohistochemical (peanut agglutinin antigen and UEA-1 for lectins; cytokeratin KL1, epithelial membrane antigen, vimentin, S100 protein, and lysozyme) staining.
RESULTS: The antibodies tested and the histochemical staining using Hale's colloidal iron allowed eosinophilic chromophobe cell carcinoma to be distinguished by its characteristic reaction pattern. Seventy-six percent of the chromophobe cell carcinomas showed a microvacuolated pattern, and 89% of the renal oncocytomas showed an apical positivity with Hale's colloidal iron staining (P < .01). Peripheral cell accentuation reactivity for cytokeratin KL1 was observed in 66% of the chromophobe cell carcinoma cases, and apical cytoplasmic positivity was observed in 37% of the renal oncocytoma cases (P = .01). Significant patterns were observed with anti-epithelial membrane antigen and anti-peanut agglutinin antigen antibodies (P = .05 and P = .01, respectively). Positive reactions for vimentin, S100 protein, lysozyme, and UEA-1 were not significant characteristics.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that a precise morphologic description associated with simple histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques provides sufficient criteria for a high level of discrimination between the eosinophilic subtype of chromophobe cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9341588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  20 in total

1.  Renal tumors: diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

Authors:  Puay Hoon Tan; Liang Cheng; Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq; Maria J Merino; George Netto; Victor E Reuter; Steven S Shen; David J Grignon; Rodolfo Montironi; Lars Egevad; John R Srigley; Brett Delahunt; Holger Moch
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Morphological, immunohistochemical, and chromosomal analysis of multicystic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, an architecturally unusual challenging variant.

Authors:  Maria Pané Foix; Ana Dunatov; Petr Martinek; Enric Condom Mundó; Saul Suster; Maris Sperga; Jose I Lopez; Monika Ulamec; Stela Bulimbasic; Delia Perez Montiel; Reza Alaghehbandan; Kvetoslava Peckova; Krystina Pivovarcikova; Daum Ondrej; Pavla Rotterova; Faruk Skenderi; Kristyna Prochazkova; Martin Dusek; Milan Hora; Michal Michal; Ondrej Hes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  [Renal cancer biomarkers. What is justified?].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Can renal oncocytoma be differentiated from its renal mimics? The utility of anti-mitochondrial, caveolin 1, CD63 and cytokeratin 14 antibodies in the differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Ozgur Mete; Isin Kilicaslan; Mine G Gulluoglu; Veli Uysal
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Correlating Preoperative Imaging with Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Common Mimickers.

Authors:  Jennifer Gordetsky; Jessica Zarzour
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Giant renal oncocytoma: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Sami Akbulut; Ayhan Senol; Bahri Cakabay; Arsenal Sezgin
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2010-02-17

7.  Feasibility of nephron-sparing surgery in giant oncocytoma.

Authors:  Albert El Hajj; Ruban Thanigasalam; Isabelle Boulay; Vincent Molinié; Bernard Escudier; Hervé Baumert
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with microcystic and adenomatous arrangement and pigmentation--a diagnostic pitfall. Morphological, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural and molecular genetic report of 20 cases.

Authors:  O Hes; T Vanecek; D M Perez-Montiel; I Alvarado Cabrero; M Hora; S Suster; J Lamovec; R Curik; V Mandys; M Michal
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 9.  Update on oncocytoma.

Authors:  Stephen M Schatz; Michael M Lieber
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe renal cell tumours do not display genomic features of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Nicolas Poté; Annick Vieillefond; Jérôme Couturier; Sandrine Arrufat; Isabelle Metzger; Nicolas B Delongchamps; Philippe Camparo; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Vincent Molinié; Mathilde Sibony
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.