Literature DB >> 9339795

A comparison of the nasal cross-sectional areas and volumes obtained with acoustic rhinometry and magnetic resonance imaging.

J P Corey1, A Gungor, R Nelson, J Fredberg, V Lai.   

Abstract

Acoustic rhinometry (AR) evaluates the geometry of the nasal cavity with acoustic reflections and provides information about nasal cross-sectional areas (CSA) and nasal volume within a given distance. The accuracy of the information obtained by AR was compared with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the nasal cavity. Five healthy subjects were evaluated with AR and the MRI before and after the application of a long-acting nasal decongestant spray, to eliminate possible interference of the nasal cycle with both measurement techniques. The MRI images of 2 mm coronal sections of the nasal cavity were traced by three independent observers and the CSAs were calculated by computer-aided imaging digitization, to be compared with the calculated CSAs obtained with the AR at the corresponding distance from the nasal tip. Digitized data from the MRI images were also used to calculate the nasal volume within the first 6 cm from the nasal tip and compared with the AR volume measurements. The interobserver variation of digitized MRI data predecongestant and postdecongestant was not significant. The correlations of CSA and volume measurements between the AR and MRI were high (0.969) after the application of the decongestant. The correlation between the AR and MRI measurements before the decongestant was low (0.345). This may have been the result of interference of the nasal cycle during the long MRI measurements (1 hour) or other unknown factors. We conclude that AR measurements of nasal CSAs and volumes provide accurate information when compared with the MRI of the decongested nasal airway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9339795     DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70125-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  16 in total

1.  The Reliability of Polyvinylidene Fluoride Sensor for Intra- and Intersession Measurements.

Authors:  Roopa G Manjunatha; Surya Prakash; Konandur Rajanna
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  Video-endoscopy and digital image analysis of the nasal valve area.

Authors:  Tilman Keck; Richard Leiacker; Stephan Kühnemann; Jörg Lindemann; Ajnacska Rozsasi; Nina Wantia
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Assessment of 3-D nasal airway morphology in Southeast Asian adults with obstructive sleep apnea using acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  Saeed M Banabilh; A H Suzina; Hazama Mohamad; Sidek Dinsuhaimi; A R Samsudin; G D Singh
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  The role of three-dimensional CT in the evaluation of nasal structures and anomalies.

Authors:  Gennaro Graviero; Luca Guastini; Renzo Mora; Giovanni Salzano; Francesco Antonio Salzano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  [Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Effects on the nasal airways and nasal septum].

Authors:  R Seeberger; W Kater; M Schulte-Geers; O C Thiele; R Davids; C H Hofele; K Freier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Acoustic reflection: review and clinical applications for sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  John S Viviano
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  Nasal dilator strip therapy for chronic sleep maintenance insomnia: a case series.

Authors:  Barry Krakow; Dominic Melendrez; Brandy Sisley; Teddy D Warner; Jessica Krakow
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.816

8.  Intersession repeatability of acoustic rhinometry measurements in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Mohammed Dhafer Al Ahmari; Jadwiga Anna Wedzicha; John Robert Hurst
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  Does cosmetic rhinoplasty affect nose function?

Authors:  Seyed Behzad Pousti; Sam Touisserkani; Maryam Jalessi; Seyed Kamran Kamrava; Nader Sadigh; Ashkan Heshmatzade Behzadi; Arash Arvin
Journal:  ISRN Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-18

10.  Using magnetic resonance imaging to quantify the inflammatory response following allergen challenge in allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Brian R Leaker; Glenis Scadding; C Richard Jones; Peter J Barnes
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2015-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.