Literature DB >> 9339453

Estimating test-retest reliability in functional MR imaging. II: Application to motor and cognitive activation studies.

D C Noll1, C R Genovese, L E Nystrom, A L Vazquez, S D Forman, W F Eddy, J D Cohen.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) using blood oxygenation contrast has rapidly spread into many application areas. In this paper, a new statistical model is used to evaluate the reliability of fMRI activation in a finger opposition motor paradigm for both within-session and between-session data and in a working memory paradigm for between-session data. A slice prescription procedure for between-session reproducibility is introduced. Estimates are made for the probabilities of correctly and falsely classifying voxels as active or inactive and receiver operator characteristic curves are generated. In the motor paradigm, estimated between-session reliability was found to be somewhat reduced relative to within-session reliability; however, this includes additional sources of variation and may not reflect intrinsically lower reliability. After matching false-positive classification probabilities, between-session reliability was found to be nearly identical for both motor and cognitive activation paradigms.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9339453     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910380320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  28 in total

1.  Reproducibility of BOLD-based functional MRI obtained at 4 T.

Authors:  C Tegeler; S C Strother; J R Anderson; S G Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging: imaging techniques and contrast mechanisms.

Authors:  A M Howseman; R W Bowtell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  FMRI of visual encoding: reproducibility of activation.

Authors:  W C Machielsen; S A Rombouts; F Barkhof; P Scheltens; M P Witter
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Reproducibility of the hemodynamic response to auditory oddball stimuli: a six-week test-retest study.

Authors:  Kent A Kiehl; Peter F Liddle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Determination of individual stimulus--response curves in the visual cortex.

Authors:  Rogier E Hagenbeek; Serge A R B Rombouts; Bob W van Dijk; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Reproducibility of functional MR imaging results using two different MR systems.

Authors:  Erik-Jan Vlieger; Cristina Lavini; Charles B Majoie; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Reproducibility of swallow-induced cortical BOLD positive and negative fMRI activity.

Authors:  Arash Babaei; B Douglas Ward; Shahryar Ahmad; Anna Patel; Andrew Nencka; Shi-Jiang Li; James Hyde; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.052

8.  Test-retest reliability in fMRI of language: group and task effects.

Authors:  E Elinor Chen; Steven L Small
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Reproducibility of functional MR imaging: preliminary results of prospective multi-institutional study performed by Biomedical Informatics Research Network.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Douglas N Greve; Meng Wang; Steven D Pieper; Simon K Warfield; Nathan S White; Sanjay Manandhar; Gregory G Brown; Mark G Vangel; Ron Kikinis; William M Wells
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Meta-analysis of functional imaging data using replicator dynamics.

Authors:  Jane Neumann; Gabriele Lohmann; Jan Derrfuss; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.