Literature DB >> 9338099

Yeast checkpoint controls and relevance to cancer.

T Weinert1.   

Abstract

Checkpoint controls arrest cells with defects in DNA replication or DNA damage. For several reasons, checkpoint controls may be relevant to ontogeny and treatment of cancer. Firstly, mutations in two human genes, TP53 and ATM, give rise to cellular defects in cell cycle checkpoints and are associated with cancer. Secondly, although checkpoint defects potentially render the cell damage sensitive, they may do so only in combination with other defects in the cell's response to damage. Therefore, manipulation of checkpoint defects, requiring a description of normal and mutant pathways, will be required for this type of therapeutic approach. Those pathways are being described in yeast cells. In budding yeast, the study of checkpoint genes has led to the view that these genes have many roles in the cellular responses to DNA damage, including roles in arrest in multiple stages of cell cycle, in transcriptional induction of repair genes, in DNA repair itself and additionally some undefined role in DNA replication. The checkpoint pathways and proteins that carry out these responses may consist of sensor proteins that detect damage, signaller proteins that transduce an inhibitory signal and target proteins that are altered to arrest cell division (or cause other changes in cell behaviour). Yeast genes that may act at each step have been identified, leading to a working model of checkpoint pathways. An initial step in the pathway may involve the processing of damage to an intermediate that signals arrest and acts in DNA repair. Human checkpoint pathways may have defects in processing damage as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9338099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Surv        ISSN: 0261-2429


  12 in total

1.  Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway.

Authors:  V Paciotti; M Clerici; M Scotti; G Lucchini; M P Longhese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  CADLIVE for constructing a large-scale biochemical network based on a simulation-directed notation and its application to yeast cell cycle.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kurata; Nana Matoba; Natsumi Shimizu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  An essential role for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DEAD-box helicase DHH1 in G1/S DNA-damage checkpoint recovery.

Authors:  Megan Bergkessel; Joseph C Reese
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity.

Authors:  G Liberi; I Chiolo; A Pellicioli; M Lopes; P Plevani; M Muzi-Falconi; M Foiani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Spontaneous chromosome loss in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is suppressed by DNA damage checkpoint functions.

Authors:  H L Klein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  AtATM is essential for meiosis and the somatic response to DNA damage in plants.

Authors:  Valérie Garcia; Hugues Bruchet; Delphine Camescasse; Fabienne Granier; David Bouchez; Alain Tissier
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Analyzing the dose-dependence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae global transcriptional response to methyl methanesulfonate and ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Michael G Benton; Swetha Somasundaram; Jeremy D Glasner; Sean P Palecek
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Limiting amounts of budding yeast Rad53 S-phase checkpoint activity results in increased resistance to DNA alkylation damage.

Authors:  Violeta Cordón-Preciado; Sandra Ufano; Avelino Bueno
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  DNA repair in Drosophila: insights from the Drosophila genome sequence.

Authors:  J J Sekelsky; M H Brodsky; K C Burtis
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-07-24       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Warburg effect and translocation-induced genomic instability: two yeast models for cancer cells.

Authors:  Valentina Tosato; Nana-Maria Grüning; Michael Breitenbach; Remigiusz Arnak; Markus Ralser; Carlo V Bruschi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.