Literature DB >> 9337695

Game-theory models of interactions between tumour cells.

I P Tomlinson1.   

Abstract

The population of cells that comprises a tumour may consist of genetically different individuals. Often, such polymorphisms result from the expansion of a new, advantageous clone. The hypothesis is presented that sometimes tumour cells may adopt genetically-determined strategies to boost their own replication at the expense of other cells in the tumour. Simple game-theory models have been used to study this hypothesis, taking as an example the hypothetical advantage gained by tumour cells which produce a cytotoxin to harm other tumour cells. The models show that genotypes which cause cells to produce cytotoxic substances can spread through the tumour cell population, as can genotypes for resistance to the cytotoxin; in other circumstances, stable polymorphisms between these strategies can occur. The path of the tumour cell population to internal or external equilibrium is often complex, with large fluctuations in genotype frequencies. Flexible strategies are usually superior to fixed strategies. As in populations of whole organisms, 'social' interactions between tumour cells can act in favour of the individual cell at the expense of the tumour as a whole: strategies that retard the growth of the tumour can be selected and tumour regression is theoretically possible. Many mutations in tumours, especially in large or late-stage lesions, may play a role in relations between tumour cells rather than providing those cells with a simple replicative advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9337695     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00170-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  31 in total

1.  Evolutionary cheating in Escherichia coli stationary phase cultures.

Authors:  M Vulic; R Kolter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Edge effects in game-theoretic dynamics of spatially structured tumours.

Authors:  Artem Kaznatcheev; Jacob G Scott; David Basanta
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Evolutionary dynamics of two related malignant plasma cell lines.

Authors:  David Dingli; Bonnie K Arendt; Zeljko Bajzer; Diane F Jelinek
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Cancer heterogeneity and multilayer spatial evolutionary games.

Authors:  Andrzej Świerniak; Michał Krześlak
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.540

5.  Exploiting evolution to treat drug resistance: combination therapy and the double bind.

Authors:  David Basanta; Robert A Gatenby; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Bacteria and game theory: the rise and fall of cooperation in spatially heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Guillaume Lambert; Saurabh Vyawahare; Robert H Austin
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Evolution of cell motility in an individual-based model of tumour growth.

Authors:  P Gerlee; A R A Anderson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 8.  Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-11-18

9.  Evolutionary game theory elucidates the role of glycolysis in glioma progression and invasion.

Authors:  D Basanta; M Simon; H Hatzikirou; A Deutsch
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.831

10.  Cancer phenotype as the outcome of an evolutionary game between normal and malignant cells.

Authors:  D Dingli; F A C C Chalub; F C Santos; S Van Segbroeck; J M Pacheco
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.