Literature DB >> 19040573

Evolutionary game theory elucidates the role of glycolysis in glioma progression and invasion.

D Basanta1, M Simon1, H Hatzikirou1, A Deutsch1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Tumour progression has been described as a sequence of traits or phenotypes that cells have to acquire if the neoplasm is to become an invasive and malignant cancer. Although genetic mutations that lead to these phenotypes are random, the process by which some of these mutations become successful and cells spread is influenced by tumour microenvironment and the presence of other cell phenotypes. It is thus likely that some phenotypes that are essential in tumour progression will emerge in the tumour population only with prior presence of other different phenotypes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we use evolutionary game theory to analyse the interactions between three different tumour cell phenotypes defined by autonomous growth, anaerobic glycolysis, and cancer cell invasion. The model allows us to understand certain specific aspects of glioma progression such as the emergence of diffuse tumour cell invasion in low-grade tumours.
RESULTS: We have found that the invasive phenotype is more likely to evolve after appearance of the glycolytic phenotype which would explain the ubiquitous presence of invasive growth in malignant tumours.
CONCLUSIONS: The result suggests that therapies, which increase the fitness cost of switching to anaerobic glycolysis, might decrease probability of the emergence of more invasive phenotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19040573      PMCID: PMC6495695          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2008.00563.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Prolif        ISSN: 0960-7722            Impact factor:   6.831


  19 in total

Review 1.  The hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  D Hanahan; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  An evolutionary-game model of tumour-cell interactions: possible relevance to gene therapy.

Authors:  L A Bach; S M Bentzen; J Alsner; F B Christiansen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Mathematical oncology: cancer summed up.

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Philip K Maini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evolutionary game theory in an agent-based brain tumor model: exploring the 'Genotype-Phenotype' link.

Authors:  Yuri Mansury; Mark Diggory; Thomas S Deisboeck
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Dichotomy of astrocytoma migration and proliferation.

Authors:  A Giese; M A Loo; N Tran; D Haskett; S W Coons; M E Berens
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1996-07-17       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Acid-mediated tumor invasion: a multidisciplinary study.

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Edward T Gawlinski; Arthur F Gmitro; Brant Kaylor; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Tumor morphology and phenotypic evolution driven by selective pressure from the microenvironment.

Authors:  Alexander R A Anderson; Alissa M Weaver; Peter T Cummings; Vito Quaranta
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Game-theory models of interactions between tumour cells.

Authors:  I P Tomlinson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Modelling the consequences of interactions between tumour cells.

Authors:  I P Tomlinson; W F Bodmer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Mathematical models of targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  L H Abbott; F Michor
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  39 in total

1.  Impact of metabolic heterogeneity on tumor growth, invasion, and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Mark Robertson-Tessi; Robert J Gillies; Robert A Gatenby; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Edge effects in game-theoretic dynamics of spatially structured tumours.

Authors:  Artem Kaznatcheev; Jacob G Scott; David Basanta
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Production of 2-hydroxyglutarate by isocitrate dehydrogenase 1-mutated gliomas: an evolutionary alternative to the Warburg shift?

Authors:  Jacob G Scott; David Basanta; Prakash Chinnaiyan; Peter Canoll; Kristen R Swanson; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Spatial evolutionary games with weak selection.

Authors:  Mridu Nanda; Richard Durrett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cancer heterogeneity and multilayer spatial evolutionary games.

Authors:  Andrzej Świerniak; Michał Krześlak
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.540

6.  Exploiting evolution to treat drug resistance: combination therapy and the double bind.

Authors:  David Basanta; Robert A Gatenby; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Cancer models, genomic instability and somatic cellular Darwinian evolution.

Authors:  Mark P Little
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  Evolution of cell motility in an individual-based model of tumour growth.

Authors:  P Gerlee; A R A Anderson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 9.  The biology and mathematical modelling of glioma invasion: a review.

Authors:  J C L Alfonso; K Talkenberger; M Seifert; B Klink; A Hawkins-Daarud; K R Swanson; H Hatzikirou; A Deutsch
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  The mathematics of cancer: integrating quantitative models.

Authors:  Philipp M Altrock; Lin L Liu; Franziska Michor
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 60.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.