Literature DB >> 9337191

Pulmonary autograft procedure for aortic valve disease: long-term results of the pioneer series.

J C Chambers1, J Somerville, S Stone, D N Ross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary autograft replacement of the diseased aortic valve has not been widely practiced due to concerns regarding late autograft competence and the consequences of creating pulmonary valve disease. To investigate this, the fate of the pioneering series of patients has been determined. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The 131 hospital survivors of the pulmonary autograft operation at the National Heart Hospital from 1967 to 1984 were identified and their outcomes determined to 1994. Age at operation was 11 to 52 years, and 109 patients were male. Autograft implantation was orthotopic subcoronary (107), free-standing root (20), or Dacron mounted (2). In 113 patients, homografts replaced the native pulmonary valve. Ten and 20 years after operation, survival was 85% and 61%, freedom from autograft replacement was 88% and 75%, and freedom from replacement of pulmonary position homografts was 89% and 80%, respectively. Causes of deaths (53) included chronic heart failure (13), complications of reoperation (12), and endocarditis (7). Autograft regurgitation, the most common indication for reoperation, appeared primarily technical in nature, usually due to cusp prolapse. Degeneration was found in only 3 of 30 explanted autografts, and the young patients showed no increase in late valve failure. Homografts outperformed other valve replacements in the pulmonary position, but patients with orthotopic subcoronary and root autografts survived similarly.
CONCLUSIONS: The pulmonary autograft offers low rates of degeneration, endocarditis, and thromboembolism for a period lasting >20 years, particularly in the young, with reoperation mainly required for malpositioning of the autograft cusps. The capacity of the autograft to maintain viability with minimal degeneration is not matched by any other biological valve replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9337191     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.96.7.2206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  14 in total

1.  Aortic Stenosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-04

2.  A single center's experience with the Ross procedure in pediatrics.

Authors:  Edward Kirkpatrick; Roger Hurwitz; John Brown
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Pulmonary autograft in aortic position: is everything known?

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Antonio Nenna; Cristiano Spadaccio; Massimo Chello
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2017-01

Review 4.  Narrative review of the contemporary surgical treatment of unicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Maria von Stumm; Tatjana Sequeira-Gross; Johannes Petersen; Shiho Naito; Lisa Müller; Christoph Sinning; Evaldas Girdauskas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04

5.  Autologous Ross operation for congenital aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Zhuoming Xu; Anthony C Chang; Charles D Fraser; E Dean McKenzie
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 6.  What is the proper place of the Ross procedure in our modern armamentarium?

Authors:  Duke E Cameron; Luca A Vricella
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Midterm results of the Ross procedure in a pediatric population: bicuspid aortic valve is not a contraindication.

Authors:  S El Behery; J Rubay; T Sluysmans; B Absil; C Ovaert
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-03       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Pregnancy outcome and follow-up cardiac outcome in women with aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Snehalata Basude; Johanna Trinder; Massimo Caputo; Stephanie L Curtis
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-01-15

9.  Clinical results of implanted tissue engineered heart valves.

Authors:  P M Dohmen
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2012

10.  Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results.

Authors:  Torsten Christ; Herko Grubitzsch; Benjamin Claus; Wolfgang Konertz
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.