Literature DB >> 9336750

Treating adnexal masses. Operative laparoscopy vs. laparotomy.

D A Hidlebaugh1, S Vulgaropulos, R K Orr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare operative laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for the treatment of adnexal masses. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review of all surgical cases who underwent operative laparoscopy or laparotomy for an adnexal mass during 1988-1995 at one multispecialty group practice. Preoperative screening for women over 45 included a CA-125 and ultrasound. If a malignant mass was encountered, it was immediately staged by laparotomy with the assistance of a surgical oncologist. During the study period 121 patients underwent ovarian cystectomy and 284 patients, oophorectomy.
RESULTS: Laparoscopy was successfully completed in 118 of 127 (93%) oophorectomy and 71 of 72 (98%) of ovarian cystectomy patients. The incidence of malignant lesions at operative laparoscopy was 2%. The hospital stay for ovarian cystectomy was significantly shorter for laparoscopy (0.8 vs. 3.1 days). Hospital stay for oophorectomy was significantly shorter for laparoscopy (0.8 vs. 4.1 days). Ovarian cystectomy by laparotomy resulted in slightly more total complications than did laparoscopy (8% vs. 1%). Oophorectomy by laparotomy resulted in significantly more total complications than did oophorectomy by laparoscopy (29% vs. 3%). The mean total charge for laparoscopic oophorectomy was $5,873 versus $7,007 for laparotomy. The mean total charge for laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy was $4,507 vs. $5,541 for laparotomy.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of adnexal masses by operative laparoscopy can be performed safely, with reduced morbidity and patient disability, and at a reduced cost. By having an oncologist backup in house, we have been able to convert most procedures to the laparoscopic approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9336750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  5 in total

1.  Computerized model for objectively evaluating cutting performance using a laparoscopic box trainer simulator.

Authors:  Amir Handelman; Shani Schnaider; Adva Schwartz-Ossad; Refael Barkan; Ronnie Tepper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A premenopausal woman with virilization secondary to an ovarian Leydig cell tumor.

Authors:  André M Faria; Ricardo V Perez; José A M Marcondes; Daniel S Freire; Roberto Blasbalg; José Soares; Kleber Simões; Sylvia A Y Hayashida; Maria A A Pereira
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Adnexal masses suspected to be benign treated with laparoscopy.

Authors:  Richard H Demir; Greg J Marchand
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 4.  Adhesions and adhesiolysis: the role of laparoscopy.

Authors:  Stephen M Kavic; Suzanne M Kavic
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Introduction of a laparoscopic gynecological program in a general hospital in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yung Hsien Liu; Besen Yu; Chin Ming Wu; Hwee May Lin; Tsong Fuchen; Chau-Su Ou
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.