Literature DB >> 9336118

Long-term results of suture rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with incomplete rectal prolapse.

J W Briel1, W R Schouten, M O Boerma.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Suture rectopexy is the recommended therapy for complete rectal prolapse that is associated with fecal incontinence. It has been suggested that correction of an incomplete rectal prolapse is also worthwhile for patients with fecal incontinence.
PURPOSE: Aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the clinical outcome of suture rectopexy in a consecutive series of patients with incomplete rectal prolapse associated with fecal incontinence, and 2) to compare these results with those obtained from patients with complete rectal prolapse.
METHODS: Between 1979 and 1994, suture rectopexy was performed in 13 incontinent patients (3 males; median age, 65 (range, 45-77) years) with incomplete rectal prolapse (Group I) and in 24 incontinent patients (21 females; median age, 71 (range, 24-86) years) with complete rectal prolapse (Group II).
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 67 months, continence was restored in 5 of 13 (38 percent) patients with incomplete rectal prolapse and in 16 of 24 (67 percent) patients with complete rectal prolapse. In both groups, all male patients became continent.
CONCLUSIONS: For the majority of incontinent patients with incomplete rectal prolapse, a suture rectopexy is not beneficial. The clinical outcome of this procedure is only good in incontinent patients with complete rectal prolapse. Based on these data, it is questionable whether incomplete rectal prolapse plays a causative role in fecal incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9336118     DOI: 10.1007/bf02055169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  19 in total

1.  Anorectal Disease.

Authors:  P Huber; S Gregorcyk
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-06

2.  Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate?

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck; O Schwandner; J Scheele; S Farke; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Focus on abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: meta-analysis of literature.

Authors:  F Cadeddu; P Sileri; M Grande; E De Luca; L Franceschilli; G Milito
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Scott D Goldstein; Pinckney J Maxwell
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-03

5.  Functional disorders: rectoanal intussusception.

Authors:  Eric G Weiss; Elisabeth C McLemore
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

6.  Abdominal approaches for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Bashar Safar; Anthony M Vernava
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

7.  Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  T T Zittel; K Manncke; S Haug; J F Schäfer; M E Kreis; H D Becker; E C Jehle
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Constipation and obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Anders Mellgren
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

9.  Treatment of obstructed defecation.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-05

10.  Treatment of obstructed defecation.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis; Rahila Essani
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.