Literature DB >> 9335498

How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context.

R J Dolan1, G R Fink, E Rolls, M Booth, A Holmes, R S Frackowiak, K J Friston.   

Abstract

A degraded image of an object or face, which appears meaningless when seen for the first time, is easily recognizable after viewing an undegraded version of the same image. The neural mechanisms by which this form of rapid perceptual learning facilitates perception are not well understood. Psychological theory suggests the involvement of systems for processing stimulus attributes, spatial attention and feature binding, as well as those involved in visual imagery. Here we investigate where and how this rapid perceptual learning is expressed in the human brain by using functional neuroimaging to measure brain activity during exposure to degraded images before and after exposure to the corresponding undegraded versions. Perceptual learning of faces or objects enhanced the activity of inferior temporal regions known to be involved in face and object recognition respectively. In addition, both face and object learning led to increased activity in medial and lateral parietal regions that have been implicated in attention and visual imagery. We observed a strong coupling between the temporal face area and the medial parietal cortex when, and only when, faces were perceived. This suggests that perceptual learning involves direct interactions between areas involved in face recognition and those involved in spatial attention, feature binding and memory recall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9335498     DOI: 10.1038/39309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  79 in total

1.  Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape.

Authors:  Z Kourtzi; N Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural fate of seen and unseen faces in visuospatial neglect: a combined event-related functional MRI and event-related potential study.

Authors:  P Vuilleumier; N Sagiv; E Hazeltine; R A Poldrack; D Swick; R D Rafal; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Visual recognition of faces, objects, and words using degraded stimuli: where and when it occurs.

Authors:  Alan J Pegna; Asaid Khateb; Christoph M Michel; Theodor Landis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Imaging prior information in the brain.

Authors:  Scott Gorlin; Ming Meng; Jitendra Sharma; Hiroki Sugihara; Mriganka Sur; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The development, past achievements, and future directions of brain PET.

Authors:  Terry Jones; Eugenii A Rabiner
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition: Neural and Computational Bases, and a Model, VisNet.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Exogenous attention facilitates location transfer of perceptual learning.

Authors:  Ian Donovan; Sarit Szpiro; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Perceptual experience modulates cortical circuits involved in visual awareness.

Authors:  Maartje C de Jong; Zoe Kourtzi; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  The perception of a familiar face is no more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jason M Gold; Jarrett D Barker; Shawn Barr; Jennifer L Bittner; Alexander Bratch; W Drew Bromfield; Roy A Goode; Mary Jones; Doori Lee; Aparna Srinath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

10.  Categorical learning revealed in activity pattern of left fusiform cortex.

Authors:  Jessica E Goold; Ming Meng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.