Literature DB >> 9334606

Response of routine semen analysis and critical assessment of sperm morphology by Kruger classification to therapeutic varicocelectomy.

M H Vazquez-Levin1, P Friedmann, S I Goldberg, N E Medley, H M Nagler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied the effect of varicocelectomy on Kruger morphology and semen parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 33 subfertile men diagnosed with varicoceles was evaluated 3 months before, and 3 to 4 and 6 to 8 months after varicocelectomy. Evaluation involved routine semen analysis and sperm morphology using Kruger classification.
RESULTS: Significant improvement in sperm concentration and count was found after varicocelectomy (sperm count preoperatively 117.1 +/- 29, 3 to 4 months postoperatively 162.5 +/- 41 and 6 to 8 months postoperatively 139.8 +/- 25 million sperm, p = 0.0095). Using Kruger classification, evaluation of sperm morphology revealed overall significant increase in percentage of normal A forms at 3 to 4 and 6 to 8 months after surgery (from 9.8 +/- 5.8% A forms, 13.6 +/- 7.7% A forms, and 14.5 +/- 7.5% A forms, respectively, p = 0.0002, normal greater than 14%). Twelve of the 26 patients (46%) with abnormal sperm morphology preoperatively and greater than 4% A forms reached normal levels 3 months postoperatively. Six months after surgery only 6 patients maintained normal values and 3 of the initial 14 nonresponders became normal (9 of 26, 36%). Three patients with severe teratozoospermia (less than 4% A forms) showed improvement in sperm morphology. Four patients with normal sperm morphology preoperatively were not affected by varicocelectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical correction of varicocele was associated with significant improvement in sperm morphology evaluated using Kruger classification. Concentration and count improved after varicocelectomy. Changes were observed as early as 3 months after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9334606     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64134-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

Review 1.  The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Matthew A Will; Jason Swain; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sonksen; Gregory M Christman; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Surgical techniques for the management of male infertility.

Authors:  Natalya A Lopushnyan; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  [Andrologically relevant findings from the perspective of the dermatologist].

Authors:  S Volc; St Schanz
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Observation of sperm-head vacuoles and sperm morphology under light microscope.

Authors:  Yong-Seog Park; Sol Park; Duck Sung Ko; Dong Wook Park; Ju Tae Seo; Kwang Moon Yang
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2014-09-30

Review 5.  Varicocele and testicular function.

Authors:  Alexander W Pastuszak; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 6.  Critical appraisal of conventional semen analysis in the context of varicocele.

Authors:  Thinus Kruger
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 7.  Varicocele management in the era of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Piyush Pathak; Aravind Chandrashekar; Tariq S Hakky; Alexander W Pastuszak
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Sperm morphology and reproductive success.

Authors:  Jason R Kovac; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.