Literature DB >> 9333956

[Rate of infection in trauma surgery. An overview based on recent German language literature].

M Hansis1, S Arens, C Wingenfeld.   

Abstract

Infection rates are important markers for clinical quality assurance. For internal control, they may only be used under the condition of homogeneous data collection and evaluation according to identical standard operating procedures during the entire investigation period. For inter-hospital comparison, they may only be used if additionally the observed patient groups are well defined and comparable. A survey of the infection rates published during the last 6 years in the German traumatological literature (n = 71) indeed shows (concerning series later than 1985) similar infection rates for procedures in less and in more problematic anatomical regions and in clean and contaminated situations of about 2-3%, after open injuries sporadically max. 10%. Finally, it is demonstrated that conclusions concerning a general "risk of infection" based on infection rates for specific surgical procedures are not possible and vice versa. We strongly recommend the future application of a standardized definition of wound infection. The differentiation between deep and superficial infection should be abandoned. For all mentioned "infection rates" it should be indicated whether it is with reference to the risk of infection of a specific procedure or only a general statement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9333956     DOI: 10.1007/s001130050142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Special aspects of implant-associated infection in orthopedic surgery. From the pathophysiology to custom-tailored prevention strategies].

Authors:  J M Schierholz; C Morsczeck; N Brenner; D P König; N Yücel; M Korenkov; E Neugebauer; A F E Rump; G Waalenkamp; J Beuth; G Pulverer; S Arens
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Bone infections].

Authors:  A H Tiemann; R Braunschweig; G O Hofmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model.

Authors:  W Lehmann; A Ushmaev; A Ruecker; J Nuechtern; L Grossterlinden; P G Begemann; T Baeumer; J M Rueger; D Briem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Infectious bone diseases].

Authors:  A H Tiemann; V Krenn; M G Krukemeyer; C Seyfert; M Jakobs; D Baumhoer; G O Hofmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  [Influence of local application of basic fibroblast growth factor on resistance to local infection after standardized closed soft tissue trauma. An experimental study in rats].

Authors:  T Kälicke; O Sprutacz; U Schlegel; F Kutscha-Lissberg; M Köller; G Printzen; G Muhr; S Arens
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Prevalence of nosocomial wound infection among postoperative patients and antibiotics patterns at teaching hospital in Sudan.

Authors:  Mohamed Issa Ahmed
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2012-01

7.  Complications after hip fracture surgery: are they preventable?

Authors:  E R Flikweert; K W Wendt; R L Diercks; G J Izaks; D Landsheer; M Stevens; I H F Reininga
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  [Free scapular or parascapular flaps for soft tissue damage accompanying talus or calcaneus fractures].

Authors:  C Dumont; H Burchhardt; K Dresing; T Rudy; S Bohr; K M Stürmer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 0.920

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.