Literature DB >> 28795198

Complications after hip fracture surgery: are they preventable?

E R Flikweert1, K W Wendt2, R L Diercks3, G J Izaks4, D Landsheer2, M Stevens3, I H F Reininga2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Surgery for hip fractures is frequently followed by complications that hinder the rehabilitation of patients. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence rate and type of complications, including mortality, after hip fracture surgery, and to identify the risk factors of these complications that may be amenable to prevention.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study of all consecutive patients aged ≥60 treated for a hip fracture at University Medical Center Groningen between July 2009 and June 2013. All patients were treated in a comprehensive multidisciplinary care pathway. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate which variables were significant risk factors for the occurrence of complications. Additional analyses were conducted to investigate whether the independent variables were significant risk factors for several specific complications and mortality.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 479 patients with a mean age of 78.4 (SD 9.5) years; 33% were men. The overall complication rate was 75%. Delirium was the complication seen most frequently (19%); the incidence of surgical complications was 9%. Most risk factors for complications were not preventable (high comorbidity rate, high age and dependent living situation). However, general anesthesia (OR 1.51; 95% CI 0.97-2.35) and delay in surgery (OR 3.16; 95% CI 1.43-6.97) may be risk factors that can potentially be prevented. Overall, the mortality risk was not higher in patients with a complication, but delirium and pneumonia were risk factors for mortality.
CONCLUSION: The overall complication rate after hip fracture surgery was high. Only few complications were potentially preventable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Frail elderly; Hip fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28795198      PMCID: PMC6096618          DOI: 10.1007/s00068-017-0826-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


Purpose

Hip fractures are frequently encountered; the estimated worldwide incidence for the year 2000 is 1.6 million cases [1]. Most patients with a hip fracture are older and have multiple comorbidities. Most of them are female and have experienced an indoor fall [2]. Despite advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques over time, morbidity and mortality after hip fracture surgery remain high. From an economic perspective and of course also for future patients lowering such morbidity and mortality rates is an important aim. A wide range of complications are observed after hip fracture surgery. Only a small part of them is related to the surgical procedure, such as a wound infection and loss of reduction. However, because the described population consists of mostly frail elderly persons, the most commonly encountered complications are non-surgical, such as delirium, pneumonia, heart failure and pressure ulcers [3-5]. There is a shortage of literature describing risk factors for complications after hip fracture surgery. Comorbidity and delay in surgery are reported risk factors [6]. The 1-year mortality rate after hip fracture surgery of 12–33% is high, up to eight times the normal mortality rate for people aged 80 [3, 7, 8]. Risk factors for mortality after hip fracture surgery have been described in the literature. Examples of these risk factors are advanced age, male gender, living in a nursing home, poor preoperative walking capacity and high ASA score [9]. It is important to identify risk factors for complications and mortality after hip fracture surgery, especially those that can be influenced, to ameliorate outcomes and improve postoperative functioning in daily life. In addition, a reduction in complication rates will reduce costs for society. Hence, the aim of this study was to describe the incidence rate and type of complications and mortality after hip fracture surgery as well as to identify existing and preventable risk factors for both.

Methods

Design

A prospective cohort study was conducted at the Departments of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery of University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) in the Netherlands. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and the study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of UMCG (METc 2011/164). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Patients

All patients aged 60 years or older with a hip fracture treated at UMCG between 1 July 2009 and 1 May 2013 were included in this study. Patients were excluded if they had multiple injuries caused by high energetic trauma. A hip fracture was defined as a femoral neck fracture (dislocated or not dislocated) or a trochanteric fracture [subdivided into type A1, A2 or A3 according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) comprehensive classification]. In 2009, a comprehensive care pathway for the treatment of hip fractures was implemented at UMCG. The care pathway has been described before [10]. This comprehensive multidisciplinary care pathway was developed to include all elements of care in the trajectory, from arrival in the emergency room to the moment of discharge from the rehabilitation unit of the nursing home. This operative protocol for hip fractures at UMCG is based on the Dutch surgical guideline for hip fractures [11].

Data

The electronic files of the included patients were searched for complications occurring from admittance up to the last outpatient visit 6 months after surgery. Registered baseline characteristics were demographic information, medical history, fracture classification, trauma mechanism, living situation, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification and baseline blood values (hemoglobin and electrolytes). The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was calculated. This score is a method for estimating the risk of death based on comorbidities [12]. To calculate the score, 22 comorbid conditions are assigned a score of 1, 2, 3 or 6, depending on the risk of dying associated with each one. The index is the sum of the scores [12]. During hospitalization type of implant, waiting time to surgery, operation time, type of anesthesia, preoperative fasting time, length of hospital stay and blood values at discharge were taken from the electronic hospital registration system. Clinical complications and side effects were registered. All complications were also registered up to 6 months postoperatively; the mortality rate was followed up to 1 year after the operation. Complications were divided into minor and major complications. Examples of minor complications are: hematoma, urine retention, electrolyte disturbances and leg length discrepancy. Examples of major complications are: all reoperations, delirium, pneumonia, cardiac and neurological complications, and pressure ulcers.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of the study population at baseline and the number and type of complications after surgery. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate which variables were significant risk factors for the occurrence of perioperative complications. In this analysis, the dependent variable was complication (yes/no) and the independent variables were age, gender, fracture type, CCI, pre-fracture living situation, >1 day delay to first procedure (yes/no) and type of anesthesia (spinal vs. general). For the analysis patients were divided into four age groups (60–65, 65–75, 75–85, >85), four groups of CCI (0, 1, 2, ≥3), and four groups of living situation (living independently, independently with others, in an assisted living facility, in a nursing home). Additional analyses were conducted to investigate whether the independent variables were significant risk factors for several specific complications (delirium, congestive heart failure and pneumonia). In the logistic regression analyses, the independent variables were first introduced separately in univariate models, after which multivariate models were constructed with the variables with p < 0.20 using a stepwise forward selection method. Variables with p ≤ 0.10 were retained in the final multivariate models. Odds ratios (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each independent variable. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to estimate the association between several independent variables (age, gender, fracture type, complication, etc.) and 1-year mortality. First, univariate regression models were created, after which the variables with p < 0.20 were eligible to be included in the multivariate regression models. A stepwise forward selection method was used. Variables with p ≤ 0.10 were retained in the final multivariate models. Hazard ratios (HR) with the corresponding 95% CI were calculated. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 22.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 479 patients. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Most patients were elderly women with a mean age of 78.4 (SD 9.5) years, with one or more comorbidities and a median ASA classification of 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 1–4], and who lived independently (40%). The first surgical procedure for the vast majority of patients took place within the first day after admission (N = 435; 91%). Median (IQR) operation time was 92 (30–310) min. General anesthesia was used in 310 patients (65%) and spinal anesthesia in 169 patients (35%). Mean hospital stay was 8.8 days (SD 7.7).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study population (N = 479)

Age (years)a 78.4 (9.5)
Age per category (years)b
 60–6545 (10)
 66–75130 (27)
 76–85155 (32)
 ≥86149 (31)
Genderb
 Male158 (33)
 Female321 (67)
ASA classificationb
 128 (6)
 2173 (36)
 3250 (52)
 428 (6)
Charlson comorbidity indexb
 0140 (29)
 1103 (22)
 2108 (22)
 ≥3128 (27)
Prefracture living situationb
 Independently181 (38)
 Independently, with help of others129 (27)
 Assisted living facility72 (15)
 Nursing home68 (14)
 Unknown29 (6)
Fracture typeb
 A155 (12)
 A2107 (22)
 A357 (12)
 Femoral neck, undisplaced55 (12)
 Femoral neck, displaced205 (42)
Type of anesthesiab
 Spinal169 (35)
 General310 (65)
Days to first procedureb
 <2 day435 (91)
 ≥2 day44 (9)
Length of hospital stay (days)a 8.8 (7.7)

a Data presented as mean (SD)

b Data presented as N (%)

Baseline characteristics of the study population (N = 479) a Data presented as mean (SD) b Data presented as N (%)

Incidence of complications

A total of 359 patients (75%) suffered one or more complications during the 6 months of follow-up; 210 patients (44%) suffered multiple complications (Table 2). Only 119 patients (25%) did not have any negative side effects from the treatment. Of all complications, 173 (48%) were minor and 186 (52%) were classified as major. The three most frequently encountered medical complications were delirium (N = 98, 20%), pneumonia (N = 47, 10%) and congestive heart failure (N = 25, 5%). Pressure ulcers were registered in five patients (1%). Complications related to the operative procedure were seen in 13% of the patients (total wound and implant problems N = 63). Reoperation was performed in 52 patients (11%) during the follow-up period. Eighty patients (16%) only had complications that were registered during outpatient visits; most seen complications at this time were leg length difference and persistent pain. After 1 year, 129 patients (27%) had died.
Table 2

Incidence of complications during 6 months of follow-up after surgery for hip fracture

N (%)
Number of complications
 None119 (25)
 One150 (31)
 Multiple210 (44)
Specific complications
 Delirium98 (20)
 Pneumonia47 (10)
 Heart failure25 (5)
 Pressure ulcer5 (1)
 Wound problems43 (9)
 Surgical or implant-related20 (4)
 Only during follow-up (outpatient clinic)80 (16)
 Reoperation52 (11)
Mortality (1 year)129 (27)
Incidence of complications during 6 months of follow-up after surgery for hip fracture

Risk factors of complications

A statistically significant association was found between a CCI score ≥3 and the occurrence of complications after hip fracture surgery [OR = 3.19, 95% CI 1.67–6.08, p < 0.001 (Table 3)]. There was no statistically significant association between other independent variables and the occurrence of complications. Patients who received general instead of spinal anesthesia did have more complications, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 0.97–2.35, p = 0.07).
Table 3

Risk factors for complications, logistic regression analysis

Risk factorRegression coefficient p valueOR (95% CI)
Fracture type (ref. type A1)
 A20.680.081.97 (0.93–4.17)
 A30.880.0562.40 (0.98–5.91)
 Neck, undisplaced0.120.781.12 (0.50–2.54)
 Neck, displaced0.540.111.71 (0.88–3.30)
Charlson comorbidity index (ref. 0)
 1−0.040.880.96 (0.55–1.68)
 20.410.171.50 (0.84–2.68)
 ≥31.17<0.0013.19 (1.67–6.08)
Male sex−0.400.080.67 (0.43–1.06)
General anesthesia (ref. spinal anesthesia)0.410.071.51 (0.97–2.35)

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

Risk factors for complications, logistic regression analysis OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval Delirium was the most frequently observed complication. Not living independently, higher age and delay of surgery of more than 1 day were all statistically significant risk factors for getting delirium (Table 4). There was only one independent risk factor for congestive heart failure: CCI ≥ 3 (OR = 16.49, 95% CI 2.13–127.57, p = 0.007). For postoperative pneumonia, the relationship with CCI was borderline significant (OR = 2.18, 95% CI 0.97–4.90, p = 0.06). There was no statistically significant association between postoperative pneumonia and the other variables.
Table 4

Risk factors for delirium, logistic regression analysis

Risk factorRegression coefficient p valueOR (95% CI)
Charlson comorbidity index (ref. 0)
 1−0.030.940.97 (0.44–2.15)
 20.330.401.39 (0.65–2.94)
 ≥30.630.081.88 (0.94–3.75)
Prefracture living situation (ref. living independently)
 Independently, with help of others−0.110.760.90 (0.44–1.81)
 Assisted living facility0.690.051.99 (1.00–4.00)
 Nursing home0.870.022.38 (1.18–4.81)
Age (ref. 60–65)
 66–750.290.661.33 (0.37–4.77)
 76–851.050.082.85 (0.87–9.35)
 ≥861.400.024.05 (1.23–13.33)
Male sex0.450.101.57 (0.93–2.68)
Days to procedure >21.150.0053.16 (1.43–6.97)

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

Risk factors for delirium, logistic regression analysis OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

Association between complications and mortality

Patients with a complication did not have a higher mortality rate (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 0.70–2; p = 0.52, Table 5). In univariate analyses, only CCI and higher age were found to be statistically significant predictors of mortality. However, when independent variables, including the various complications, were investigated in multivariate models, delirium as well as pneumonia increased mortality risk after hip fracture surgery [HR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.46–3.32, p < 0.001; and HR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.24–3.39, p = 0.005, respectively (Table 6)].
Table 5

Risk factors for mortality, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, univariate analysis

Risk factorRegression coefficient p valueHR (95% CI)
Complication0.170.521.18 (0.70–2.00)
Charlson index (ref. 0)
 10.280.461.32 (0.63–2.79)
 20.820.022.27 (1.18–4.83)
 ≥31.29<0.0013.62 (1.98–6.64)
Age (ref. 60–65)
 66–750.600.341.82 (0.53–6.25)
 76–851.140.063.13 (0.96–10.18)
 ≥861.460.024.30 (1.33–13.91)
Male sex0.360.081.44 (0.96–2.15)

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval

Table 6

Risk factors for mortality, Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, multivariate analysis

Risk factorRegression coefficient p valueHR (95% CI)
Delirium0.79<0.0012.20 (1.46–3.32)
Pneumonia0.720.0052.05 (1.24–3.39)
Charlson index (ref. 0)
 10.230.551.26 (0.60–2.64)
 20.790.022.21 (1.14–4.26)
 ≥31.20<0.0013.31 (1.81–6.07)
Age (ref. 60–65)
 66–750.510.421.66 (0.48–5.73)
 76–850.950.122.59 (0.79–8.47)
 ≥861.210.043.37 (1.04–10.93)

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval

Risk factors for mortality, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, univariate analysis HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval Risk factors for mortality, Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, multivariate analysis HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval

Discussion

The aim of this study was to describe the complications and mortality after hip fracture surgery and to identify risk factors for both. Most remarkable outcome of this study was the high percentage of patients suffering one or more complications, namely 75%, half of which were major. Complication rates after hip fracture surgery reported in the literature vary widely between 12.5 and 57% [3, 6, 13, 14]. Possible causes of these differences in rates are study design, time to follow-up, and definition of a complication. The complication rate in our study was higher than in the literature, maybe because in our study population all kinds of side effects (surgical, medical but also long-term) were considered complications. In addition, all electronic patient files were meticulously searched again for complications after the follow-up of 6 months to complete the prospective database. It is important to realize that only a minority of hip fracture patients will be free from side effects. The three most encountered medical complications were delirium, pneumonia and congestive heart failure. A delirium incidence of 20% was found in this study. The reported incidence of delirium varies widely between 4 and 53% [15]. The comprehensive care pathway followed in this study included consultation with a geriatrician. There is some evidence that delirium can be prevented or that its severity can be reduced after geriatric consultation [16]. On the other hand, a geriatrician will diagnose delirium sooner than other specialists, resulting in a higher yet more reliable incidence rate. Pneumonia and congestive heart failure were the second and third most prevalent medical complications, with an incidence of, respectively, 10 and 5%. This is in accordance with other research [3, 17]. Possible preventive measures for these complications that were already included in the protocol for the care pathway is this study were investigation of cardiac status by the anesthesiologist, surgery on the first day after admission in supine position and early mobilization. All surgical complications together formed 13% of the complications. Because of the heterogeneity of these complications and the small numbers of each of its different components (hematoma, infection, different implant problems), this was not further analyzed. The incidence of surgical complications matches the literature. The reported surgical site infection rate after hip fracture surgery is about 5% for orthopedic trauma surgery [18, 19]. The incidence of reoperation depends on fracture type and implant, but is reported between 7 and 38% in femoral neck fractures [20, 21]. The percentage of pressure ulcers in our study was low (1%), and much lower than reported in the literature; a recent study conducted in the US showed that about one-third of hip fracture patients developed a pressure ulcer during follow-up [22]. An explanation for the low incidence could be the special preventive measures that were taken in this study. Already on the ER patients with a hip fracture were placed on a pressure ulcer-preventive mattress, and almost all patients were operated on within one day. However, the number of pressure ulcers might have been underestimated as admission time to the hospital was short, and probably not every ulcer was reported by the nursing home physician or seen during physical examination at the outpatient clinic. In this study, the only significant risk factor of developing a complication was having a high CCI (≥3). Other studies also show that having more comorbidities is the strongest risk factor for complications [3, 6]. Risk factors close to statistical significance are having an A3 type intertrochanteric fracture and getting general instead of spinal anesthesia. The A3 type intertrochanteric fracture is classified as unstable and more difficult to treat than other trochanteric fractures. Patients seem to need more analgesics [23], which might lead to more complications. Type of anesthesia is a modifiable risk factor. In this study, the number of patients that underwent general anesthesia was high (65%). Whether general or spinal anesthesia leads to fewer complications in hip fracture patients is still a matter of debate [24-27]. The recent Cochrane review did not find a difference in either technique and asked for more research [28]. Most important factor seems to be the patient himself: for some cardiac conditions general anesthesia is more safer, for other pulmonary or neurological conditions spinal anesthesia is preferred. Another known, possibly preventable risk factor for complications is delay of surgery for more than 2 days [6]. This effect was not seen in the present study, perhaps because one part of the care pathway was to operate on all patients the morning after admission, so only for a small number of patients (9%) was the operation postponed longer than 2 days. Surgery was only postponed for strict medical reasons such as sepsis or fulminant pneumonia; in these cases, these medical reasons were considered comorbidities, not complications, as they were already present at arrival in the emergency room.

Risk factors for delirium, pneumonia and congestive heart failure

The risk for delirium was higher in older patients and those living in a nursing home; some of these patients probably had cognitive dysfunction already (in this study population this was not measured during admittance), and these patients are known to be at risk for delirium [29]. In general, patients living in a nursing home have a lower performance status in comparison to patients living independently; mostly their CCI is higher resulting in a higher complication rate, as shown especially in delirium. Social isolation might play a role as a risk factor for delirium. However, a definitive answer cannot be given. Patients living independently may live as much or even more in social isolation as patients in nursing homes do. In the literature there is some evidence that the presence of family members in the hospital will help to reduce the incidence of delirium [30], moreover, that social isolation leads to a prolonged hospitalization [31]. The risk factors for delirium found in this study are also in line with the British NICE guidelines for delirium, with the most important risk factors attributed to older age, cognitive impairment and having a hip fracture [32]. The only preventable risk factor for delirium known in the literature is delay in surgery for more than 1 day, resulting in a prolonged period of bed rest and pain. We therefore believe it should be a goal of care pathways to operate patients with a hip fracture within a day of admission. In accordance with the recent literature [33], in our study general anesthesia was not associated with a higher risk of delirium. Early mobilization is one of the aspects of the comprehensive care pathway. Research has shown that early mobilization is probably one of the most important measures to reduce the incidence of pneumonia [34]. This study did not show other preventable independent risk factors for pneumonia or congestive heart failure.

Complications and mortality

The 1-year mortality rate was 27%. Although most studies report mortality rate after 3 or 4 months, this annual rate is in accordance with the literature [3, 8]. Mortality was not influenced by complications in general. The only independent risk factors for mortality were having delirium or pneumonia postoperatively. It is generally assumed that having delirium is a poor prognostic sign, and Witlox et al. showed in their meta-analysis that delirium has been proven to be an independent risk factor not only for mortality but also for institutionalization and dementia [35]. This stresses the importance of reducing the risk of delirium. Higher postoperative mortality after pneumonia has been described before [3] and is probably partly due to poor physical condition, which hampers mobilization.

Conclusion

Complication rates after hip fracture surgery are very high, reaching 75%. Medical complications such as delirium and pneumonia are encountered more frequently than surgical complications. The 1-year mortality rate in this study was 27%, and both delirium and pneumonia were risk factors for mortality. Although most risk factors cannot be influenced, early operation and mobilization seem to be important in trying to reduce the number of complications and mortality.
  33 in total

1.  Relation between prefracture characteristics and perioperative complications in the elderly adult patient with hip fracture.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; John Boling; Maria Manson; Thomas Owens; Robert Zura
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 2.  The incidence of delirium associated with orthopedic surgery: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Angela J Bruce; Craig W Ritchie; Robert Blizard; Rosalind Lai; Peter Raven
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 3.878

3.  An orthogeriatric collaborative intervention program for fragility fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andraay Hon-Chi Leung; Tsz-Ping Lam; Wing-Hoi Cheung; Tan Chan; Pan-Ching Sze; Thomas Lau; Kwok-Sui Leung
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-11

4.  Preventing delirium in older adults with recent hip fracture through multidisciplinary geriatric consultation.

Authors:  Mieke Deschodt; Tom Braes; Johan Flamaing; Elke Detroyer; Paul Broos; Patrick Haentjens; Steven Boonen; Koen Milisen
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 5.  Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Prevent or Treat Delirium in Older Patients: Clinical Practice Recommendations The SENATOR-ONTOP Series.

Authors:  I Abraha; J M Rimland; F Trotta; V Pierini; A Cruz-Jentoft; R Soiza; D O'Mahony; A Cherubini
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.075

6.  Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men.

Authors:  Patrick Haentjens; Jay Magaziner; Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Dirk Vanderschueren; Koen Milisen; Brigitte Velkeniers; Steven Boonen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Short-term complications in hip fracture surgery using spinal versus general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Adam C Fields; James D Dieterich; Kristin Buterbaugh; Calin S Moucha
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Delirium in elderly patients and the risk of postdischarge mortality, institutionalization, and dementia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joost Witlox; Lisa S M Eurelings; Jos F M de Jonghe; Kees J Kalisvaart; Piet Eikelenboom; Willem A van Gool
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Surgical site infection after surgery to repair femoral neck fracture: a French multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Jacques Merrer; Emmanuelle Girou; Alain Lortat-Jacob; Philippe Montravers; Jean-Christophe Lucet
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  Pressure ulcers in elderly patients with hip fracture across the continuum of care.

Authors:  Mona Baumgarten; David J Margolis; Denise L Orwig; Michelle D Shardell; William G Hawkes; Patricia Langenberg; Mary H Palmer; Patricia S Jones; Patrick F McArdle; Robert Sterling; Bruce P Kinosian; Shayna E Rich; Janice Sowinski; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  31 in total

1.  Development and validation of a self-care scale for older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery: the HFS-SC.

Authors:  Eun-Jeong Jeon; Kyeong-Yae Sohng; Hye-Ah Yeom
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-07-22

2.  Should advanced age be a contraindication to total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fracture patients? A matched-control, retrospective study.

Authors:  Andreas Flury; Michael Finsterwald; Dimitris Dimitriou; Naeder Helmy; Julian Hasler; Alexander Antoniadis
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-08-10

3.  Association of Depressive Symptoms With Postoperative Delirium and CSF Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease Among Hip Fracture Patients.

Authors:  Carol K Chan; Frederick E Sieber; Kaj Blennow; Sharon K Inouye; Geoffrey Kahn; Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos; Edward R Marcantonio; Karin J Neufeld; Paul B Rosenberg; Nae-Yuh Wang; Henrik Zetterberg; Constantine G Lyketsos; Esther S Oh
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  Acute hip fracture surgery anaesthetic technique and 30-day mortality in Sweden 2016 and 2017: A retrospective register study.

Authors:  Caroline Gremillet; Jan G Jakobsson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-07-05

5.  Delay to Surgery of Less Than 12 Hours Is Associated With Improved Short- and Long-Term Survival in Moderate- to High-Risk Hip Fracture Patients.

Authors:  Markus T Hongisto; Maria S Nuotio; Tiina Luukkaala; Olli Väistö; Harri K Pihlajamäki
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-05-29

6.  Effect of frailty on quality of life in elderly patients after hip fracture: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Cornelis L P van de Ree; Maud J F Landers; Nena Kruithof; Leonie de Munter; Joris P J Slaets; Taco Gosens; Mariska A C de Jongh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Diabetes and Risk of Post-Fragility Hip Fracture Outcomes in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Wenqing Tian; Jueli Wu; Tao Tong; Lu Zhang; Aiguo Zhou; Ning Hu; Wei Huang; Bo Zhou
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.257

8.  Clinical Practice Guideline for Postoperative Rehabilitation in Older Patients With Hip Fractures.

Authors:  Kyunghoon Min; Jaewon Beom; Bo Ryun Kim; Sang Yoon Lee; Goo Joo Lee; Jung Hwan Lee; Seung Yeol Lee; Sun Jae Won; Sangwoo Ahn; Heui Je Bang; Yonghan Cha; Min Cheol Chang; Jung-Yeon Choi; Jong Geol Do; Kyung Hee Do; Jae-Young Han; Il-Young Jang; Youri Jin; Dong Hwan Kim; Du Hwan Kim; In Jong Kim; Myung Chul Kim; Won Kim; Yun Jung Lee; In Seok Lee; In-Sik Lee; JungSoo Lee; Chang-Hyung Lee; Seong Hoon Lim; Donghwi Park; Jung Hyun Park; Myungsook Park; Yongsoon Park; Ju Seok Ryu; Young Jin Song; Seoyon Yang; Hee Seung Yang; Ji Sung Yoo; Jun-Il Yoo; Seung Don Yoo; Kyoung Hyo Choi; Jae-Young Lim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  The association between the Revised Cardiac Risk Index and short-term mortality after hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Maximilian Peter Forssten; Ahmad Mohammad Ismail; Gabriel Sjolin; Rebecka Ahl; Per Wretenberg; Tomas Borg; Shahin Mohseni
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  In-Hospital Postoperative Pneumonia Following Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery: Incidence and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Kuo Zhao; Junzhe Zhang; Junyong Li; Jialiang Guo; Hongyu Meng; Yanbin Zhu; Yingze Zhang; Zhiyong Hou
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.