Literature DB >> 9333113

On our age-related bone loss: insights from a new paradigm.

H M Frost1.   

Abstract

Bone strength and "mass" normally adapt to the largest voluntary loads on bones. The loads come from muscles, not body weight. Bone modeling can increase bone strength and "mass," bone remodeling can conserve or reduce them, and each can turn ON and OFF in response to its own threshold range of bone strains. During growth, the loads on bones from body weight and muscle forces increase, and modeling correspondingly increases bone strength and "mass." In young adults those loads usually plateau, so bone strength can "catch up" and modeling can turn OFF. Meanwhile remodeling keeps existing bone. After about 30 years of age, muscle strength usually decreases. In aging adults this would put bones that had adapted to stronger young-adult muscles into partial disuse and make remodeling begin to reduce their strength and "mass," as disuse regularly does in experimental situations in other mammals, both growing and adult. Those changes associate strongly with the size of the bone strains caused by the loads on bone. While nonmechanical effects associated with aging should contribute to that age-related bone loss too, a new skeletal paradigm suggests the above mechanical influences would dominate control of the process in time and anatomical space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9333113     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.10.1539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  86 in total

1.  Low skeletal muscle mass associates with low femoral neck strength, especially in older Korean women: the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV).

Authors:  B-J Kim; S H Ahn; H M Kim; S H Lee; J-M Koh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture.

Authors:  Pasi Pulkkinen; Juha Partanen; Pekka Jalovaara; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Nutrition, bone, and aging: an integrative physiology approach.

Authors:  Rifka C Schulman; Aaron J Weiss; Jeffrey I Mechanick
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Bone geometry and strength adaptations to physical constraints inherent in different sports: comparison between elite female soccer players and swimmers.

Authors:  Beatrice Ferry; Martine Duclos; Lauren Burt; Perrine Therre; Franck Le Gall; Christelle Jaffré; Daniel Courteix
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Differential Age-related Changes in Bone Geometry between the Humerus and the Femur in Healthy Men.

Authors:  Matti D Allen; S Jared McMillan; Cliff S Klein; Charles L Rice; Greg D Marsh
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 6.745

6.  UK reference data for the Hologic QDR Discovery dual-energy x ray absorptiometry scanner in healthy children and young adults aged 6-17 years.

Authors:  Kate A Ward; Rebecca L Ashby; Steven A Roberts; Judith E Adams; M Zulf Mughal
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Regional variation of intracortical porosity in the midshaft of the human femur: age and sex differences.

Authors:  C David L Thomas; Sophie A Feik; John G Clement
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Bone geometry profiles in women with and without SLE.

Authors:  Jimmy D Alele; Diane L Kamen; Kelly J Hunt; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Reduced gravitational loading does not account for the skeletal effect of botulinum toxin-induced muscle inhibition suggesting a direct effect of muscle on bone.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Matthew R Galley; Jeffrey S Richard; Lydia A George; Rachel C Dirks; Elizabeth A Guildenbecher; Ashley M Judd; Alexander G Robling; Robyn K Fuchs
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.