Literature DB >> 9332768

Prognostic value of specific KRAS mutations in lung adenocarcinomas.

J M Siegfried1, A T Gillespie, R Mera, T J Casey, P Keohavong, J R Testa, J D Hunt.   

Abstract

Adenocarcinomas of the lung remain a significant public health problem. Locally defined (stage I) tumors are considered amenable to resection with curative intent. However, only about 45% of these patients survive for 5 years. The median survival for more advanced tumors is drastically lower. Much research has been focused on identifying a valid genetic biomarker of prognosis. Mutations of the proto-oncogene KRAS have been identified by some groups as being a valid prognostic indicator for adenocarcinoma of the lung. To evaluate the effect of KRAS gene mutation on the survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma, 181 archival tumors were examined by PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Mutations in either codon 12 or 13 were found in 31.5% of the samples. The most common mutation was a G-->T transversion in codon 12, representing 66.7% of the mutations. No difference was observed in the survival of patients with a KRAS mutation versus those whose tumors contained wild-type KRAS. This lack of difference was also observed when the analysis was restricted to those with stage I tumors or when patients with stage I or II disease were grouped together. However, certain amino acid substitutions, including cysteine, arginine, and aspartate, indicated a significantly poorer prognosis, whereas hydrophobic amino acid substitutions showed a significantly better prognosis than wild-type (P = 0.04). Sample sizes were small for this analysis due to the number of possible mutations. As expected, the stage of tumor at resection was the most significant predictor of outcome. Based on this study of 181 patients from two major medical centers located in different cities, we conclude that KRAS mutation status is not a satisfactory predictor of prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma, but the substitution of a polar or charged amino acid for the wild-type glycine residue may be a negative prognostic indicator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9332768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  19 in total

1.  Association Between Computed Tomographic Features and Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Mutations in Patients With Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma and Their Prognostic Value.

Authors:  Hua Wang; Matthew B Schabath; Ying Liu; Olya Stringfield; Yoganand Balagurunathan; John J Heine; Steven A Eschrich; Zhaoxiang Ye; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 2.  The pervasiveness of macropinocytosis in oncological malignancies.

Authors:  Cosimo Commisso
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Effect of KRAS oncogene substitutions on protein behavior: implications for signaling and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Nathan T Ihle; Lauren A Byers; Edward S Kim; Pierre Saintigny; J Jack Lee; George R Blumenschein; Anne Tsao; Suyu Liu; Jill E Larsen; Jing Wang; Lixia Diao; Kevin R Coombes; Lu Chen; Shuxing Zhang; Mena F Abdelmelek; Ximing Tang; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; John D Minna; Scott M Lippman; Waun K Hong; Roy S Herbst; Ignacio I Wistuba; John V Heymach; Garth Powis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  RAS signaling and anti-RAS therapy: lessons learned from genetically engineered mouse models, human cancer cells, and patient-related studies.

Authors:  Bingliang Fang
Journal:  Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai)       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.848

5.  Kinetics of O(6)-methyl-2'-deoxyguanosine repair by O(6)-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase within K-ras gene-derived DNA sequences.

Authors:  Rebecca Guza; Mathur Rajesh; Qingming Fang; Anthony E Pegg; Natalia Tretyakova
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.739

6.  Tailoring tyrosine kinase inhibitors to fit the lung cancer genome.

Authors:  Brendan D Looyenga; Irene Cherni; Jeffrey P Mackeigan; Glen J Weiss
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 7.  Lung cancer. 9: Molecular biology of lung cancer: clinical implications.

Authors:  K M Fong; Y Sekido; A F Gazdar; J D Minna
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Epistatic interactions govern chemically-induced lung tumor susceptibility and Kras mutation site in murine C57BL/6J-ChrA/J chromosome substitution strains.

Authors:  Lori D Dwyer-Nield; Jay McQuillan; Annie Hill-Baskin; Richard A Radcliffe; Ming You; Joseph H Nadeau; Alvin M Malkinson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  K-ras mutations in sinonasal cancers in relation to wood dust exposure.

Authors:  Jette Bornholdt; Johnni Hansen; Torben Steiniche; Michael Dictor; Annemarie Antonsen; Henrik Wolff; Vivi Schlünssen; Reetta Holmila; Danièle Luce; Ulla Vogel; Kirsti Husgafvel-Pursiainen; Håkan Wallin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Kinetics of O(6)-pyridyloxobutyl-2'-deoxyguanosine repair by human O(6)-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase.

Authors:  Delshanee Kotandeniya; Daniel Murphy; Shuo Yan; Soobong Park; Uthpala Seneviratne; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Anthony Pegg; Sreenivas Kanugula; Fekadu Kassie; Natalia Tretyakova
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.