Literature DB >> 22247021

Effect of KRAS oncogene substitutions on protein behavior: implications for signaling and clinical outcome.

Nathan T Ihle1, Lauren A Byers, Edward S Kim, Pierre Saintigny, J Jack Lee, George R Blumenschein, Anne Tsao, Suyu Liu, Jill E Larsen, Jing Wang, Lixia Diao, Kevin R Coombes, Lu Chen, Shuxing Zhang, Mena F Abdelmelek, Ximing Tang, Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou, John D Minna, Scott M Lippman, Waun K Hong, Roy S Herbst, Ignacio I Wistuba, John V Heymach, Garth Powis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mutations in the v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) play a critical role in cancer cell growth and resistance to therapy. Most mutations occur at codons 12 and 13. In colorectal cancer, the presence of any mutant KRas amino acid substitution is a negative predictor of patient response to targeted therapy. However, in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the evidence that KRAS mutation is a predictive factor is conflicting.
METHODS: We used data from a molecularly targeted clinical trial for 215 patients with tissues available out of 268 evaluable patients with refractory NSCLC to examine associations between specific mutant KRas proteins and progression-free survival and tumor gene expression. Transcriptome microarray studies of patient tumor samples and reverse-phase protein array studies of a panel of 67 NSCLC cell lines with known substitutions in KRas and in immortalized human bronchial epithelial cells stably expressing different mutant KRas proteins were used to investigate signaling pathway activation. Molecular modeling was used to study the conformations of wild-type and mutant KRas proteins. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to analyze survival data. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Patients whose tumors had either mutant KRas-Gly12Cys or mutant KRas-Gly12Val had worse progression-free survival compared with patients whose tumors had other mutant KRas proteins or wild-type KRas (P = .046, median survival = 1.84 months) compared with all other mutant KRas (median survival = 3.35 months) or wild-type KRas (median survival = 1.95 months). NSCLC cell lines with mutant KRas-Gly12Asp had activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3-K) and mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) signaling, whereas those with mutant KRas-Gly12Cys or mutant KRas-Gly12Val had activated Ral signaling and decreased growth factor-dependent Akt activation. Molecular modeling studies showed that different conformations imposed by mutant KRas may lead to altered association with downstream signaling transducers.
CONCLUSIONS: Not all mutant KRas proteins affect patient survival or downstream signaling in a similar way. The heterogeneous behavior of mutant KRas proteins implies that therapeutic interventions may need to take into account the specific mutant KRas expressed by the tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22247021      PMCID: PMC3274509          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  29 in total

1.  Endogenous oncogenic K-ras(G12D) stimulates proliferation and widespread neoplastic and developmental defects.

Authors:  David A Tuveson; Alice T Shaw; Nicholas A Willis; Daniel P Silver; Erica L Jackson; Sandy Chang; Kim L Mercer; Rebecca Grochow; Hanno Hock; Denise Crowley; Sunil R Hingorani; Tal Zaks; Catrina King; Michael A Jacobetz; Lifu Wang; Roderick T Bronson; Stuart H Orkin; Ronald A DePinho; Tyler Jacks
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; Rosemary Braun; Wei Wang; James Gumbart; Emad Tajkhorshid; Elizabeth Villa; Christophe Chipot; Robert D Skeel; Laxmikant Kalé; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Kirsten ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: the multicenter "RASCAL" study.

Authors:  H J Andreyev; A R Norman; D Cunningham; J R Oates; P A Clarke
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Structural basis for the interaction of Ras with RalGDS.

Authors:  L Huang; F Hofer; G S Martin; S H Kim
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1998-06

5.  K-ras modulates the cell cycle via both positive and negative regulatory pathways.

Authors:  J Fan; J R Bertino
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1997-05-29       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Differences in KRAS mutation spectrum in lung cancer cases between African Americans and Caucasians after occupational or environmental exposure to known carcinogens.

Authors:  Jay D Hunt; Anna Strimas; Julie E Martin; Marilyn Eyer; Monica Haddican; Brian G Luckett; Bernardo Ruiz; T William Axelrad; Wayne L Backes; Elizabeth T H Fontham
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Prognostic value of specific KRAS mutations in lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  J M Siegfried; A T Gillespie; R Mera; T J Casey; P Keohavong; J R Testa; J D Hunt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Distinct requirements for Ras oncogenesis in human versus mouse cells.

Authors:  Nesrin M Hamad; Joel H Elconin; Antoine E Karnoub; Wenli Bai; Jeremy N Rich; Robert T Abraham; Channing J Der; Christopher M Counter
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Crystal structure and functional analysis of Ras binding to its effector phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma.

Authors:  M E Pacold; S Suire; O Perisic; S Lara-Gonzalez; C T Davis; E H Walker; P T Hawkins; L Stephens; J F Eccleston; R L Williams
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-12-08       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Frequency and spectrum of mutations at codons 12 and 13 of the c-K-ras gene in human tumors.

Authors:  G Capella; S Cronauer-Mitra; M A Pienado; M Perucho
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  187 in total

1.  A novel PI3K inhibitor iMDK suppresses non-small cell lung Cancer cooperatively with A MEK inhibitor.

Authors:  Naomasa Ishida; Takuya Fukazawa; Yutaka Maeda; Tomoki Yamatsuji; Katsuya Kato; Kenichi Matsumoto; Tsuyoshi Shimo; Nagio Takigawa; Jeffrey A Whitsett; Yoshio Naomoto
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  RASSF1A Deficiency Enhances RAS-Driven Lung Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  M Lee Schmidt; Katharine R Hobbing; Howard Donninger; Geoffrey J Clark
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  KRAS G13D sensitivity to neurofibromin-mediated GTP hydrolysis.

Authors:  Dana Rabara; Timothy H Tran; Srisathiyanarayanan Dharmaiah; Robert M Stephens; Frank McCormick; Dhirendra K Simanshu; Matthew Holderfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Management of KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Jacqueline V Aredo; Sukhmani K Padda
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-06-27

5.  Oxaliplatin reverses the GLP-1R-mediated promotion of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by altering FoxO1 signaling.

Authors:  Bendong Chen; Wenyan Zhou; Wenchao Zhao; Peng Yuan; Chaofeng Tang; Genwang Wang; Junzhi Leng; Jinlong Ma; Xiaowen Wang; Yongfeng Hui; Qi Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Ras and Rap1: A tale of two GTPases.

Authors:  Seema Shah; Ethan J Brock; Kyungmin Ji; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 15.707

7.  Association between PD-L1 expression and driver gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer patients: correlation with clinical data.

Authors:  Eleni A Karatrasoglou; Ilenia Chatziandreou; Stratigoula Sakellariou; Konstantinos Stamopoulos; Nikolaos Kavantzas; Andreas C Lazaris; Penelope Korkolopoulou; Angelica A Saetta
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  VEGF neutralizing aerosol therapy in primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma with K-ras activating-mutations.

Authors:  Virginie Hervé; Nathalie Rabbe; Laurent Guilleminault; Flora Paul; Laurène Schlick; Nicolas Azzopardi; Michael Duruisseaux; Delphine Fouquenet; Jérôme Montharu; Françoise Redini; Gilles Paintaud; Etienne Lemarié; Jacques Cadranel; Marie Wislez; Nathalie Heuzé-Vourc'h
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.857

9.  EZH2 protein expression associates with the early pathogenesis, tumor progression, and prognosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Carmen Behrens; Luisa M Solis; Heather Lin; Ping Yuan; Ximing Tang; Humam Kadara; Erick Riquelme; Hector Galindo; Cesar A Moran; Neda Kalhor; Stephen G Swisher; George R Simon; David J Stewart; J Jack Lee; Ignacio I Wistuba
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  The prognostic and predictive value of KRAS oncogene substitutions in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Liza C Villaruz; Mark A Socinski; Diana E Cunningham; Simion I Chiosea; Timothy F Burns; Jill M Siegfried; Sanja Dacic
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.