Literature DB >> 9331193

The effects of donor age on the outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in adults.

D A Palay1, T A Kangas, R D Stulting, K Winchester, D Litoff, J H Krachmer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to determine whether there is a higher incidence of complications in adult patients receiving corneas from pediatric donors compared to those receiving corneas from adult donors.
DESIGN: The design is a follow-up of two matched cohorts. PARTICIPANTS: The outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in 29 adult patients (age 20 years of age and older) receiving pediatric donor corneas (range, 0-5 years) was compared to that of 29 control patients matched for recipient age and diagnosis who received adult donor corneas (range, 40-70 years). INTERVENTION: Chart review was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Graft rejection, postoperative keratometry, postoperative refractive cylinder, postoperative intraocular pressure, and graft failure due to rejection were measured.
RESULTS: One or more allograft reactions occurred in 11 (37.9%) of 29 patients who received pediatric donor corneas compared to 2 (6.9%) of 29 patients who received adult donor corneas (P = 0.005, chi-square). There were a total of 20 rejection episodes in patients receiving pediatric donor corneas compared to a total of 5 rejection episodes in patients receiving adult donor corneas. The average postoperative keratometry was 46.1 diopters for the pediatric donor group and 44.0 diopters for the adult donor group (P = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in average refractive cylinder (P = 1.0), intraocular pressure (P = 0.26), or the incidence of graft failure due to rejection (P = 1.0) between the two groups. The average follow-up time for clear grafts was 58.3 months in the pediatric donor group and 59.9 months in the adult donor group.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of allograft reactions and the postoperative corneal curvature is greater in adult eyes undergoing penetrating keratoplasty with young donor corneas compared to those undergoing penetrating keratoplasty with older donor corneas. There was no difference in the incidence of graft failure due to rejection between the two groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9331193     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30094-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  10 in total

1.  Corneal graft rejection 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty in the cornea donor study.

Authors:  Steven P Dunn; Robin L Gal; Craig Kollman; Dan Raghinaru; Mariya Dontchev; Christopher L Blanton; Edward J Holland; Jonathan H Lass; Kenneth R Kenyon; Mark J Mannis; Shahzad I Mian; Christopher J Rapuano; Walter J Stark; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Cornea procurement from very old donors: post organ culture cornea outcome and recipient graft outcome.

Authors:  P Gain; G Thuret; C Chiquet; P Rizzi; J L Pugniet; S Acquart; J J Colpart; J C Le Petit; J Maugery
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Development of retrocorneal membrane following pig-to-monkey penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Whayoung Lee; Alex Mammen; Deepinder K Dhaliwal; Cassandra Long; Yuko Miyagawa; David Ayares; David K C Cooper; Hidetaka Hara
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.907

4.  Effect of donor and recipient factors on corneal graft rejection.

Authors:  R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Roy Beck; Michael Belin; Mariya Dontchev; Robert S Feder; Robin L Gal; Edward J Holland; Craig Kollman; Mark J Mannis; Francis Price; Walter Stark; David D Verdier
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Outcome of primary adult optical penetrating keratoplasty with imported donor corneas.

Authors:  Michael D Wagoner; El-Sayed Gonnah; Abdul-Elah Al-Towerki
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Effect of Donor Graft Quality on Clinical Outcomes After Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus.

Authors:  Sepehr Feizi; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Hassan Ghasemi; Fatemeh Javadi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

Review 7.  Post-keratoplasty astigmatism management by relaxing incisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gaëlle Ho Wang Yin; Louis Hoffart
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-06

8.  Clinical outcomes after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty using donor corneas from children younger than 3 years.

Authors:  Rong-Mei Peng; Yu-Xin Guo; Yuan Qiu; Jing Hong; Ge-Ge Xiao; Hong-Qiang Qu
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Effect of Donor Age on Graft Survival in Primary Penetrating Keratoplasty with Imported Donor Corneas.

Authors:  Hyeon Yoon Kwon; Joon Young Hyon; Hyun Sun Jeon
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02

10.  Endothelial failure and rejection in recipients of corneas from the same donor.

Authors:  Lewis Downward; Mahmoud Ahmed; Cathy Hopkinson; Vito Romano; Elinor Curnow; Stephen B Kaye
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.