Literature DB >> 9328897

Comparison of performance with frequency transposition hearing aids and conventional hearing aids.

T C Parent1, R Chmiel, J Jerger.   

Abstract

Four experienced hearing aid users were evaluated using a frequency transposition (TranSonic) hearing system. Following a trial period, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (APHAB) and a variety of speech audiometric measures were used to compare the frequency transposition fitting with each subject's conventional hearing aids. A single-subject study design with a series of repeated measures permitted statistical analysis of differences in performance with the various amplification strategies. Two of the four subjects demonstrated statistically significant benefit with the frequency transposition device. Results show the efficacy of frequency transposition in improving speech understanding and quality of life in some individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Overall, results suggest the need for evaluating the benefit of frequency transposition on an individual basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9328897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  8 in total

1.  A historical perspective on digital hearing AIDS: how digital technology has changed modern hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-03

2.  The causes and effects of distortion and internal noise in hearing AIDS.

Authors:  J Agnew
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-09

3.  Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing AIDS.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-03

Review 4.  Frequency-lowering devices for managing high-frequency hearing loss: a review.

Authors:  Andrea Simpson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

5.  Effect of digital frequency compression (DFC) on speech recognition in candidates for combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie; Marlene Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Vijay Parsa; Andrew Johnson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Evaluation of a Frequency-Lowering Algorithm for Adults With High-Frequency Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marina Salorio-Corbetto; Thomas Baer; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Comparison of Frequency Transposition and Frequency Compression for People With Extensive Dead Regions in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Marina Salorio-Corbetto; Thomas Baer; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.