Literature DB >> 9327475

Integrating pros and cons for mammography and Pap testing: extending the construct of decisional balance to two behaviors.

W Rakowski1, M A Clark, D N Pearlman, B Ehrich, B K Rimer, M G Goldstein, C E Dube, H Woolverton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to study health-related behaviors in combination rather than singly will lead to a more comprehensive approach to health promotion. This investigation focused on mammography and Pap testing. One index was created to reflect the recency of receiving both examinations. A second index integrated opinions about the two procedures into a single measure, guided by the pros, cons, and decisional balance constructs of the Transtheoretical Model of behavior change.
METHOD: Data were drawn from the baseline and 1-year follow-up surveys of an HMO sample of women ages 40-74 (N = 1,605). Data collection occurred by telephone. A series of analyses examined whether recency of screening was associated with opinions about screening.
RESULTS: The first analysis showed that recency of Pap testing and whether or not a Pap test was obtained between the two surveys were associated with opinions about Pap testing. The next analysis examined the association between the indicator for regularity of both Pap testing and mammography, with the measure of opinions toward the two procedures. The variable measuring receipt of Pap test and mammography was associated with the combined measure of opinions.
CONCLUSIONS: The ability to employ combined indicators for recency of testing and test-related opinions is promising for being able to take a more comprehensive approach to women's health. The paper discusses methodological considerations that arise when attempting to integrate two or more behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9327475     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  15 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of an educational intervention to increase CRC screening rates in the African American community: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Errol J Philip; Katherine DuHamel; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices among women at risk of breast cancer following a pediatric malignancy: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Stephanie M Smith; Jennifer S Ford; William Rakowski; Chaya S Moskowitz; Lisa Diller; Melissa M Hudson; Ann C Mertens; Annette L Stanton; Tara O Henderson; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Ethnic differences in decisional balance and stages of mammography adoption.

Authors:  Regina Otero-Sabogal; Susan Stewart; Sarah J Shema; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2006-08-04

4.  Psychometric properties of the cervical smear belief inventory for Chinese women.

Authors:  Su-I Hou; Wei-Ming Luh
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2005

5.  Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Literacy Among Korean American Women: A Community Health Worker-Led Intervention.

Authors:  Hae-Ra Han; Youngshin Song; Miyong Kim; Haley K Hedlin; Kyounghae Kim; Hochang Ben Lee; Debra Roter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Breast cancer surveillance practices among women previously treated with chest radiation for a childhood cancer.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Jennifer S Ford; Chaya S Moskowitz; Lisa R Diller; Melissa M Hudson; Joanne F Chou; Stephanie M Smith; Ann C Mertens; Tara O Henderson; Debra L Friedman; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Effectiveness of Cultivando la Salud: a breast and cervical cancer screening promotion program for low-income Hispanic women.

Authors:  María E Fernández; Alicia Gonzales; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Janet Williams; Monica Saavedra-Embesi; Wenyaw Chan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Relationships between decisional balance and stage of adopting mammography and Pap testing among Chinese American women.

Authors:  Carol Strong; Wenchi Liang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Construct validity and invariance of four factors associated with colorectal cancer screening across gender, race, and prior screening.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Cognitive and emotional factors predicting decisional conflict among high-risk breast cancer survivors who receive uninformative BRCA1/2 results.

Authors:  Christine Rini; Suzanne C O'Neill; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Rachel E Goldsmith; Lina Jandorf; Karen Brown; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.