CONTEXT: As medical costs are increasingly being scrutinized, there is heightened interest in defining variations in physician behavior in clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if standardized patient (SP) technology is a reliable and feasible method of studying interphysician variations in test ordering, referral requests, prescribing behavior, and visit costs. DESIGN: The study was conducted with blinded SP visits to family medicine and internal medicine residents, university-affiliated family physicians, and community-based family physicians. Resource utilization and visit costs were assessed using test requisitions, consult requests, and prescriptions that were collected by the SPs. SETTING: Physicians' offices in ambulatory care, hospital-based clinics and in the community. PARTICIPANTS: Four persons (aged 57-77 years) trained to simulate having osteoarthritis of the hip. In one simulation, the patient had gastropathy due to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, and in the other, the patient sought therapy for hip discomfort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reliability of cost estimates of physician services, tests, consultations, prescriptions, and total visits and test-ordering behavior for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory gastropathy. RESULTS: Overall, 112 (63%) of the physicians who were sent invitations to the study agreed to participate. Of 312 total SP visits conducted over a 1-year period, unblinding due to SP detection occurred on 36 occasions (11.5%). Reliable cost estimates of physician services, tests, and consultations, and moderately reliable estimates of total visit costs, were obtained with 4 visits per practicing physician and with 2 visits per resident. There were extreme variations in total visit costs generated by the study physicians. A small number of physicians had a major impact on this variability. CONCLUSION: Standardized patient technology provides a reliable, feasible method to assess variations in resource utilization between physicians.
CONTEXT: As medical costs are increasingly being scrutinized, there is heightened interest in defining variations in physician behavior in clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if standardized patient (SP) technology is a reliable and feasible method of studying interphysician variations in test ordering, referral requests, prescribing behavior, and visit costs. DESIGN: The study was conducted with blinded SP visits to family medicine and internal medicine residents, university-affiliated family physicians, and community-based family physicians. Resource utilization and visit costs were assessed using test requisitions, consult requests, and prescriptions that were collected by the SPs. SETTING: Physicians' offices in ambulatory care, hospital-based clinics and in the community. PARTICIPANTS: Four persons (aged 57-77 years) trained to simulate having osteoarthritis of the hip. In one simulation, the patient had gastropathy due to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, and in the other, the patient sought therapy for hip discomfort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reliability of cost estimates of physician services, tests, consultations, prescriptions, and total visits and test-ordering behavior for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory gastropathy. RESULTS: Overall, 112 (63%) of the physicians who were sent invitations to the study agreed to participate. Of 312 total SP visits conducted over a 1-year period, unblinding due to SP detection occurred on 36 occasions (11.5%). Reliable cost estimates of physician services, tests, and consultations, and moderately reliable estimates of total visit costs, were obtained with 4 visits per practicing physician and with 2 visits per resident. There were extreme variations in total visit costs generated by the study physicians. A small number of physicians had a major impact on this variability. CONCLUSION: Standardized patient technology provides a reliable, feasible method to assess variations in resource utilization between physicians.
Authors: Carol E Franz; Ron Epstein; Katherine N Miller; Arthur Brown; Jun Song; Mitchell Feldman; Peter Franks; Steven Kelly-Reif; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Ronald M Epstein; Peter Franks; Cleveland G Shields; Sean C Meldrum; Katherine N Miller; Thomas L Campbell; Kevin Fiscella Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: David B Seaburn; Diane Morse; Susan H McDaniel; Howard Beckman; Jordan Silberman; Ronald Epstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ronald M Epstein; Taj Hadee; Jennifer Carroll; Sean C Meldrum; Judi Lardner; Cleveland G Shields Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-10-31 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Cornelia M Borkhoff; Gillian A Hawker; Hans J Kreder; Richard H Glazier; Nizar N Mahomed; James G Wright Journal: CMAJ Date: 2008-03-11 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Paul Giesen; Rosa Ferwerda; Roelie Tijssen; Henk Mokkink; Roeland Drijver; Wil van den Bosch; Richard Grol Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2007-06