Literature DB >> 10759999

Recognition of patient referral desires in an academic managed care plan frequency, determinants, and outcomes.

G A Albertson1, C T Lin, J Kutner, L M Schilling, S N Anderson, R J Anderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and determinants of provider nonrecognition of patients' desires for specialist referral.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Internal medicine clinic in an academic medical center providing primary care to patients enrolled in a managed care plan. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve faculty internists serving as primary care providers (PCPs) for 856 patient visits.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were given previsit and postvisit questionnaires asking about referral desire and visit satisfaction. Providers, blinded to patients' referral desire, were asked after the visit whether a referral was discussed, who initiated the referral discussion, and whether the referral was indicated. Providers failed to discuss referral with 27% of patients who indicated a definite desire for referral and with 56% of patients, who indicated a possible desire for referral. There was significant variability in provider recognition of patient referral desire. Recognition is defined as the provider indicating that a referral was discussed when the patient marked a definite or possible desire for referral. Provider recognition improved significantly (P <.05), when the patient had more than one referral desire, if the patient or a family member was a health care worker and when the patient noted a definite desire versus a possible desire for referral. Patients were more likely (P <.05) to initiate a referral discussion when they had seen the PCP previously and had more than one referral desire. Of patient-initiated referral requests, 14% were considered "not indicated" by PCPs. Satisfaction with care did not differ in patients with a referral desire that were referred and those that were nor referred.
CONCLUSIONS: These PCPs frequently failed to explicitly recognize patients' referral desires. Patients were more likely to initiate discussions of a referral desire when they saw their usual PCP and had more than a single referral desire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10759999      PMCID: PMC1495440          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2000.02208.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  21 in total

1.  Referrals of adult patients from primary care: demographic disparities and their relationship to HMO insurance.

Authors:  P Franks; C M Clancy
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Concerns and expectations in patients presenting with physical complaints. Frequency, physician perceptions and actions, and 2-week outcome.

Authors:  R L Marple; K Kroenke; C R Lucey; J Wilder; C A Lucas
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-07-14

3.  Use of standardized patients to assess between-physician variations in resource utilization.

Authors:  P J McLeod; R M Tamblyn; D Gayton; R Grad; L Snell; L Berkson; M Abrahamowicz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Effects of a self-administered previsit questionnaire to enhance awareness of patients' concerns in primary care.

Authors:  J Hornberger; D Thom; T MaCurdy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Assessing patients' expectations in ambulatory medical practice. Does the measurement approach make a difference?

Authors:  R L Kravitz; E J Callahan; R Azari; D Antonius; C E Lewis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Does dissatisfaction with access to specialists affect the desire to leave a managed care plan?

Authors:  E A Kerr; R D Hays; M L Lee; A L Siu
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  Prevalence and sources of patients' unmet expectations for care.

Authors:  R L Kravitz; E J Callahan; D Paterniti; D Antonius; M Dunham; C E Lewis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Preserving the patient referral process in the managed care environment.

Authors:  T C Rosenthal; T A Riemenschneider; J Feather
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  How do physicians respond to patient's requests for costly, unindicated services?

Authors:  T H Gallagher; B Lo; M Chesney; K Christensen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Prescribing and referral in general practice: a study of patients' expectations and doctors' actions.

Authors:  S Webb; M Lloyd
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.386

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Dropping the baton: specialty referrals in the United States.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Christopher B Forrest; Caroline Y Lin
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Increasing patient-initiation of cardiac rehabilitation referral in female percutaneous coronary intervention patients.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Alexandra Evindar; Dina Brooks; Susan Jaglal; Beth L Abramson; Robert Nolan
Journal:  Can J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2005

3.  Has the use of physician gatekeepers declined among HMOs? Evidence from the United States.

Authors:  Hai Fang; Hong Liu; John A Rizzo
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2009-04-09

4.  From physician to consumer: the effectiveness of strategies to manage health care utilization.

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Maureen A Smith; Margaret K Davis
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Bridging the care continuum: patient information needs for specialist referrals.

Authors:  Carol L Ireson; Svetla Slavova; Carol L Steltenkamp; F Douglas Scutchfield
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  General practitioners referring patients to specialists in tertiary healthcare: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tzartzas; Pierre-Nicolas Oberhauser; Régis Marion-Veyron; Céline Bourquin; Nicolas Senn; Friedrich Stiefel
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.497

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.