Literature DB >> 9322829

The impact of physician vs automated blood pressure readings on office-induced hypertension.

M G Myers1, G Meglis, G Polemidiotis.   

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) readings in the doctor's office are frequently higher than home or ambulatory values. This study examines the role of the physician in the aetiology of the 'white coat' effect, by comparing standard readings taken by the family physician of 27 treated hypertensive patients with readings taken by an automated BP recording device, with the patient alone in the examining room during the same office visit. The physician and automated readings were each compared to the mean awake ambulatory BP. Mean (+/-s.e.m.) routine office BP (mm Hg) recorded by the patient's physician (155+/-4/80+/-2) was similar to the mean value obtained using the automated BP recording device (157+/-3/83+/-2). The mean awake ambulatory BP was 145+/-3/78+/-2 with the systolic value lower (P < 0.05) than either the physician or automated reading. Self-measurement of BP by the patient in the office setting does not reduce the magnitude of the white coat effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9322829     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  8 in total

1.  Patient self-monitoring of blood pressure in general practice: the 'inverse white-coat' response.

Authors:  Sue M Turnbull; Sean P Magennis; Chris J Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Unattended versus attended automated office blood pressure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the same methodology for both methods.

Authors:  Anastasios Kollias; Emelina Stambolliu; Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis; Areti Gravvani; George S Stergiou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  A meta-analysis that helps clarify the use of automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Comparisons of automated blood pressures in a primary health care setting with self-measurements at the office and at home using the Omron i-C10 device.

Authors:  Isam Al-Karkhi; Raad Al-Rubaiy; Ulf Rosenqvist; Magnus Falk; Fredrik H Nystrom
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 5.  Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  A Short History of Automated Office Blood Pressure - 15 Years to SPRINT.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 7.  Automated measurement of blood pressure in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Marshall Godwin
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Blood pressure measurements taken by patients are similar to home and ambulatory blood pressure measurements.

Authors:  Angela M G Pierin; Edna C Ignez; Wilson Jacob Filho; Alfonso Júlio Guedes Barbato; Décio Mion
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.365

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.