Literature DB >> 9322721

Bile duct imaging and injury: a regional audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A E Merrie1, M W Booth, A Shah, R A Pettigrew, J L McCall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to report details of practice with respect to bile duct imaging and bile duct injury.
METHODS: A prospective audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was undertaken in the Otago region from the introduction of LC in 1991 through to December 1995. The audit includes all procedures done by all surgeons in public and private hospitals over the period without exclusion.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in 929 patients and completed laparoscopically in 832 (89.6%). Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was undertaken with increasing frequency over the study period, from 5.9% in 1991 to 32.2% in 1995. The overall IOC rate for individual surgeons varied from 4.5 to 47.6%. The use of peri-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) increased with the introduction of LC but has plateaued at approximately 6%. A total of 15.4% of patients with one or more clinical indicators of choledocholithiasis underwent LC without any form of bile duct imaging. Eight main bile duct injuries (0.86%) and a further 18 bile leaks occurred (total bile duct injury rate 2.8%). Intra-operative cholangiography was attempted (unsuccessfully) in only one patient with main duct injury, although five of the eight injuries were recognized intra-operatively.
CONCLUSION: This prospective regional audit demonstrates a gradual return to the use of IOC, a modest but stable reliance on peri-operative ERCP, and a higher than expected rate of bile-duct injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9322721     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1997.tb07114.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg        ISSN: 0004-8682


  5 in total

1.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S B Archer; D W Brown; C D Smith; G D Branum; J G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  An algorithm for the management of bile leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  F Ahmad; R N Saunders; G M Lloyd; D M Lloyd; G S M Robertson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Risk identification and technical modifications reduce the incidence of post-cholecystectomy bile leakage: analysis of 5675 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors:  Ahmad H M Nassar; Hwei Jene Ng
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Double incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DILC) with routinary intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) : less trauma, same safety. Report on 30 consecutive non-selected cases.

Authors:  Dario D'Antonio; Boris Franzato; Grazia Fusco; Mariangela Ruperto; Aldo Dal Pozzo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-02-10

5.  Critical view of safety faster and safer technique during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Mohammad Zarin; Muhammad Asim Khan; Maryam Alam Khan; Syed Asad Maroof Shah
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.