INTRODUCTION: The management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy has evolved with increased experience of ERCP and laparoscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a minimally invasive management protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with a bile leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy were recorded consecutively between 1993 and 2003. Between 1993-1998, 10 patients were managed on a case-by-case basis. Between 1998-2003, 14 patients were managed according to a minimally invasive protocol utilising ERC/biliary stenting and re-laparoscopy if indicated. RESULTS: Bile leaks presented as bile in a drain left in situ post laparoscopic cholecystectomy (8/10 versus 10/14) or biliary peritonitis (2/10 versus 4/14). Prior to 1998, neither ERC nor laparoscopy were utilised routinely. During this period, 4/10 patients recovered with conservative management and 6/10 (60%) underwent laparotomy. There was one postoperative death and median hospital stay post laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 10 days (range, 5-30 days). In the protocol era, ERC +/- stenting was performed in 11/14 (P = 0.01 versus pre-protocol) with the main indication being a persistent bile leak. Re-laparoscopy was necessary in 5/14 (P = 0.05 versus preprotocol). No laparotomies were performed (P < 0.01 versus pre-protocol) and there were no postoperative deaths. Median hospital stay was 11 days (range, 5-55 days). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a minimally invasive protocol utilising ERC and re-laparoscopy offers an effective modern algorithm for the management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
INTRODUCTION: The management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy has evolved with increased experience of ERCP and laparoscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a minimally invasive management protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with a bile leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy were recorded consecutively between 1993 and 2003. Between 1993-1998, 10 patients were managed on a case-by-case basis. Between 1998-2003, 14 patients were managed according to a minimally invasive protocol utilising ERC/biliary stenting and re-laparoscopy if indicated. RESULTS:Bile leaks presented as bile in a drain left in situ post laparoscopic cholecystectomy (8/10 versus 10/14) or biliary peritonitis (2/10 versus 4/14). Prior to 1998, neither ERC nor laparoscopy were utilised routinely. During this period, 4/10 patients recovered with conservative management and 6/10 (60%) underwent laparotomy. There was one postoperative death and median hospital stay post laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 10 days (range, 5-30 days). In the protocol era, ERC +/- stenting was performed in 11/14 (P = 0.01 versus pre-protocol) with the main indication being a persistent bile leak. Re-laparoscopy was necessary in 5/14 (P = 0.05 versus preprotocol). No laparotomies were performed (P < 0.01 versus pre-protocol) and there were no postoperative deaths. Median hospital stay was 11 days (range, 5-55 days). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a minimally invasive protocol utilising ERC and re-laparoscopy offers an effective modern algorithm for the management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Authors: Giovanni D De Palma; Giuseppe Galloro; Gianpaolo Iuliano; Alessandro Puzziello; Francesco Persico; Stefania Masone; Giovanni Persico Journal: Hepatogastroenterology Date: 2002 Jul-Aug
Authors: K Mergener; J C Strobel; P Suhocki; P S Jowell; R A Enns; M S Branch; J Baillie Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: D J Bjorkman; D L Carr-Locke; D R Lichtenstein; A P Ferrari; A Slivka; J Van Dam; D C Brooks Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Neven Ljubičić; Alen Bišćanin; Tajana Pavić; Marko Nikolić; Ivan Budimir; August Mijić; Ana Đuzel Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2015-05-16