Literature DB >> 9322619

Correlation between cervical cytologic results and Gram stain as diagnostic tests for bacterial vaginosis.

J D Davis1, E E Connor, P Clark, E J Wilkinson, P Duff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the reliability of the Papanicolaou smear in making the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis with the vaginal Gram stain used as the diagnostic standard. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a prospective, blinded, cross-sectional study of 210 consecutive patients referred to the Colposcopy Clinic for evaluation of abnormal cervical cytologic results. Each patient had a standard Papanicolaou smear and Gram stain of vaginal discharge. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Papanicolaou smear were determined with the Gram stain used as the standard for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
RESULTS: Of the 210 patients, 80 (38.1%) had Gram stains that were positive for bacterial vaginosis and 118 (56.2%) had negative Gram stains. Twelve (5.7%) had intermediate Gram stains that were also considered negative. Of the 80 patients with positive Gram stains, 44 had cervical smears consistent with bacterial vaginosis and 36 had negative smears. Of the 130 patients with negative Gram stains, two had a positive cervical smear. Therefore, compared to the Gram stain, cervical cytologic test results had a sensitivity of 55% and a specificity of 98%. The respective positive predictive and negative predictive values were 96% and 78%.
CONCLUSION: Compared to Gram stain of vaginal secretions, the cervical Papanicolaou smear has fair sensitivity (55%) and excellent positive predictive value (96%) in diagnosing bacterial vaginosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9322619     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70141-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of two alternative sample transport and fixation methods in the microbiological diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Erica Eason; Baldwin Toye; George A Wells; Mary Senterman
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-11

2.  The laboratory diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Deborah Money
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.471

3.  Hand-Held Zoom Micro-Imaging System Based on Microfluidic Chip for Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) of Vaginal Inflammation.

Authors:  Ning Yang; Jingxin Peng; Liang Wu; Xue Han; Naila Shaheen; Xiaobo Zou
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.316

Review 4.  Gynecologic conditions and bacterial vaginosis: implications for the non-pregnant patient.

Authors:  R L Sweet
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000

5.  Comparison of Gram stain and Pap smear procedures in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Enver Vardar; Izzet Maral; Murat Inal; Ozgül Ozgüder; Funda Tasli; Hakan Postaci
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002

6.  Reliability of conventional Papanicolaou smear in diagnosing bacterial vaginosis among women with clinical genital infection.

Authors:  Kavita Vivek Anand; Sharmila Anil Pimple; Gauravi A Mishra; Rupali V Sahare; Saleem Pathuthara; Kedar K Deodhar; Surendra S Shastri
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.