Literature DB >> 9319538

How well are FREQUENCY SENSITIVITIES OF grasshopper ears tuned to species-specific song spectra?

.   

Abstract

Grasshoppers of 20 acridid species were examined using spectral analysis, laser vibrometry and electrophysiology to determine whether the song spectra, the best frequencies of tympanal-membrane vibrations and the threshold curves of the tympanal nerves are adapted to one another. The songs of almost all species have a relatively broad-band maximum in the region between 20 and 40 kHz and a narrower peak between 5 and 15 kHz. There are clear interspecific differences in the latter, which are not correlated with the length of the body or of the elytra. At the site of attachment of the low-frequency receptors (a-cells), the tympanal membrane oscillates with maximal amplitude in the region from 5 to 10 kHz. At the attachment site of the high-frequency receptors (d-cells), there is also a maximum in this region as well as another around 15-20 kHz. The tympanal nerve is most sensitive to tones between 5 and 10 kHz, with another sensitivity maximum between 25 and 35 kHz. The species may differ from one another in the position of the low-frequency peaks of the membrane oscillation, of the nerve activity and of the song spectra. No correlation was found between the characteristic frequency of the membrane oscillation and the area of the tympanal membrane. Within a given species, the frequency for maximal oscillation of the membrane at the attachment site of the low-frequency receptors and the frequency for maximal sensitivity of the tympanal nerve are in most cases very close to the low-frequency peak in the song spectrum. In the high-frequency range, the situation is different: here, the position of the peak in the song spectrum is not correlated with the membrane oscillation maximum at the attachment site of the high-frequency receptors, although there is a correlation between the song spectrum and the sensitivity of the tympanal nerve. On the whole, therefore, hearing in acridid grasshoppers is quite well adjusted to the frequency spectra of the songs, partly because the tympanal membrane acts as a frequency filter in the low-frequency range.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 9319538     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.199.7.1631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  14 in total

1.  Representation of acoustic communication signals by insect auditory receptor neurons.

Authors:  C K Machens; M B Stemmler; P Prinz; R Krahe; B Ronacher; A V Herz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The auditory system of non-calling grasshoppers (Melanoplinae: Podismini) and the evolutionary regression of their tympanal ears.

Authors:  Gerlind U C Lehmann; Sandra Berger; Johannes Strauss; Arne W Lehmann; Hans-Joachim Pflüger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Response recovery in the locust auditory pathway.

Authors:  Sarah Wirtssohn; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Sensory ecology and perceptual allocation: new prospects for neural networks.

Authors:  Steven M Phelps
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Levels of genetic polymorphism: marker loci versus quantitative traits.

Authors:  R K Butlin; T Tregenza
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Selective forces on origin, adaptation and reduction of tympanal ears in insects.

Authors:  Johannes Strauß; Andreas Stumpner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Processing of simple and complex acoustic signals in a tonotopically organized ear.

Authors:  Jennifer Hummel; Konstantin Wolf; Manfred Kössl; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Computational principles underlying recognition of acoustic signals in grasshoppers and crickets.

Authors:  Bernhard Ronacher; R Matthias Hennig; Jan Clemens
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Hearing and frequency dependence of auditory interneurons in the parasitoid fly Homotrixa alleni (Tachinidae: Ormiini).

Authors:  Andreas Stumpner; Geoff R Allen; Reinhard Lakes-Harlan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Encoding of amplitude modulations by auditory neurons of the locust: influence of modulation frequency, rise time, and modulation depth.

Authors:  Sandra Wohlgemuth; Astrid Vogel; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.