Literature DB >> 9317775

Flight kinematics of black-billed magpies and pigeons over a wide range of speeds

.   

Abstract

To investigate how birds that differ in morphology change their wing and body movements while flying at a range of speeds, we analyzed high-speed (60 Hz) video tapes of black-billed magpies (Pica pica) flying at speeds of 4-14 m s-1 and pigeons (Columba livia) flying at 6-20 m s-1 in a wind-tunnel. Pigeons had higher wing loading and higher-aspect-ratio wings compared with magpies. Both species alternated phases of steady-speed flight with phases of acceleration and deceleration, particularly at intermediate flight speeds. The birds modulated their wingbeat kinematics among these phases and frequently exhibited non-flapping phases while decelerating. Such modulation in kinematics during forward flight is typical of magpies but not of pigeons in the wild. The behavior of the pigeons may have been a response to the reduced power costs for flight in the closed wind-tunnel relative to those for free flight at similar speeds. During steady-speed flight, wingbeat frequency did not change appreciably with increasing flight speed. Body angle relative to the horizontal, the stroke-plane angles of the wingtip and wrist relative to the horizontal and the angle describing tail spread at mid-downstroke all decreased with increasing flight speed, thereby illustrating a shift in the dominant function of wing flapping from weight support at slow speeds to positive thrust at fast speeds. Using wingbeat kinematics to infer lift production, it appeared that magpies used a vortex-ring gait during steady-speed flight at all speeds whereas pigeons used a vortex-ring gait at 6 and 8 m s-1, a transitional vortex-ring gait at 10 m s-1, and a continuous-vortex gait at faster speeds. Both species used a vortex-ring gait for acceleration and a continuous-vortex gait or a non-flapping phase for deceleration during flight at intermediate wind-tunnel speeds. Pigeons progressively flexed their wings during glides as flight speed increased but never performed bounds. Wingspan during glides in magpies did not vary with flight speed, but the percentage of bounds among non-flapping intervals increased with speed from 10 to 14 m s-1. The use of non-flapping wing postures seemed to be related to the gaits used during flapping and to the aspect ratio of the wings. We develop an 'adverse-scaling' hypothesis in which it is proposed that the ability to reduce metabolic and mechanical power output using flap-bounding flight at fast flight speeds is scaled negatively with body mass. This represents an alternative to the 'fixed-gear' hypothesis previously suggested by other authors to explain the use of intermittent flight in birds. Future comparative studies in the field would be worthwhile, especially if instantaneous flight speeds and within-wingbeat kinematics were documented; new studies in the laboratory should involve simultaneous recording of wing kinematics and aerodynamic forces on the wing.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 9317775     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.199.2.263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  26 in total

1.  How do birds' tails work? Delta-wing theory fails to predict tail shape during flight.

Authors:  Matthew R Evans; Mikael Rosén; Kirsty J Park; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Wake structure and wingbeat kinematics of a house-martin Delichon urbica.

Authors:  M Rosén; G R Spedding; A Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Precocial development of locomotor performance in a ground-dwelling bird (Alectoris chukar): negotiating a three-dimensional terrestrial environment.

Authors:  Brandon E Jackson; Paolo Segre; Kenneth P Dial
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Muscle function in avian flight: achieving power and control.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Predicting power-optimal kinematics of avian wings.

Authors:  Ben Parslew
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Pigeons trade efficiency for stability in response to level of challenge during confined flight.

Authors:  C David Williams; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; Laura Y Matloff; Amanda Kay Stowers; Emily R Tucci; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Power of the wingbeat: modelling the effects of flapping wings in vertebrate flight.

Authors:  M Klein Heerenbrink; L C Johansson; A Hedenström
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.704

9.  Flight feather attachment in rock pigeons (Columba livia): covert feathers and smooth muscle coordinate a morphing wing.

Authors:  Tobin L Hieronymus
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Adaptive control of turbulence intensity is accelerated by frugal flow sampling.

Authors:  Daniel B Quinn; Yous van Halder; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.