Literature DB >> 9317705

WHEN DOES MOTION RELATIVE TO NEIGHBORING SURFACES ALTER THE FLOW THROUGH ARRAYS OF HAIRS?

.   

Abstract

Many animals from different phyla use structures bearing arrays of hairs to perform a variety of important functions, such as olfaction, gas exchange, suspension feeding and locomotion. The performance of all these functions depends on the motion of water or air around and through these arrays of hairs. Because organisms often move such hair-bearing appendages with respect to their bodies or the substratum, we assessed the effects of such motion relative to walls on the fluid flow between neighboring hairs. We compared flow fields near dynamically scaled physical models of hairs moving near walls with those calculated for such hairs in an unbounded fluid. Our results suggest that the methods an organism can use to change the flow through a hair-bearing appendage differ with Reynolds number (based on hair diameter). When Re is 10(-2) or below, changing speed does not alter the proportion of the fluid that moves through rather than around the array, whereas moving relative to a wall increases it. In contrast, when Re is between 10(-2) and 1, changes in speed have a big effect on the proportion of fluid moving through the array, while moving near walls makes little difference.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 9317705     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.193.1.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

Review 1.  Physical modelling in biomechanics.

Authors:  M A R Koehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Divergence of streamlines approaching a pectinate insect antenna: consequences for chemoreception.

Authors:  Catherine Loudon; Elizabeth C Davis
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Ontogenetic changes in the olfactory antennules of the shore crab, Hemigrapsus oregonensis, maintain sniffing function during growth.

Authors:  Lindsay D Waldrop; Miranda Hann; Amy K Henry; Agnes Kim; Ayesha Punjabi; M A R Koehl
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Insect pectinate antennae maximize odor capture efficiency at intermediate flight speeds.

Authors:  Mourad Jaffar-Bandjee; Thomas Steinmann; Gijs Krijnen; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Do terrestrial hermit crabs sniff? Air flow and odorant capture by flicking antennules.

Authors:  Lindsay D Waldrop; M A R Koehl
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  What Can Computational Modeling Tell Us about the Diversity of Odor-Capture Structures in the Pancrustacea?

Authors:  Lindsay D Waldrop; Yanyan He; Shilpa Khatri
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  A Flight Sensory-Motor to Olfactory Processing Circuit in the Moth Manduca sexta.

Authors:  Samual P Bradley; Phillip D Chapman; Kristyn M Lizbinski; Kevin C Daly; Andrew M Dacks
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Contrast enhancement of stimulus intermittency in a primary olfactory network and its behavioral significance.

Authors:  Hong Lei; Jeffrey A Riffell; Stephanie L Gage; John G Hildebrand
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2009-02-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.