Literature DB >> 30242545

What Can Computational Modeling Tell Us about the Diversity of Odor-Capture Structures in the Pancrustacea?

Lindsay D Waldrop1, Yanyan He2, Shilpa Khatri3.   

Abstract

A major transition in the history of the Pancrustacea was the invasion of several lineages of these animals onto land. We investigated the functional performance of odor-capture organs, antennae with olfactory sensilla arrays, through the use of a computational model of advection and diffusion of odorants to olfactory sensilla while varying three parameters thought to be important to odor capture (Reynolds number, gap-width-to-sensillum-diameter ratio, and angle of the sensilla array with respect to oncoming flow). We also performed a sensitivity analysis on these parameters using uncertainty quantification to analyze their relative contributions to odor-capture performance. The results of this analysis indicate that odor capture in water and in air are fundamentally different. Odor capture in water and leakiness of the array are highly sensitive to Reynolds number and moderately sensitive to angle, whereas odor capture in air is highly sensitive to gap widths between sensilla and moderately sensitive to angle. Leakiness is not a good predictor of odor capture in air, likely due to the relative importance of diffusion to odor transport in air compared to water. We also used the sensitivity analysis to make predictions about morphological and kinematic diversity in extant groups of aquatic and terrestrial crustaceans. Aquatic crustaceans will likely exhibit denser arrays and induce flow within the arrays, whereas terrestrial crustaceans will rely on more sparse arrays with wider gaps and little-to-no animal-induced currents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational modeling; Fluid dynamics; Insect; Olfaction; Sensilla; Sniffing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30242545     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-018-1017-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  47 in total

1.  Staying the course: chemical signal spatial properties and concentration mediate cross-stream motion in turbulent plumes.

Authors:  Jennifer L Page; Brian D Dickman; Donald R Webster; Marc J Weissburg
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Olfaction: responses of a decapod crustacean are enhanced by flicking.

Authors:  B C Schmitt; B W Ache
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Finding food: how marine invertebrates use chemical cues to track and select food.

Authors:  Michiya Kamio; Charles D Derby
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 13.423

Review 4.  Crustacean olfactory systems: A comparative review and a crustacean perspective on olfaction in insects.

Authors:  S Harzsch; J Krieger
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Lobster sniffing: antennule design and hydrodynamic filtering of information in an odor plume.

Authors:  M A Koehl; J R Koseff; J P Crimaldi; M G McCay; T Cooper; M B Wiley; P A Moore
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Antennal morphology as a physical filter of olfaction: temporal tuning of the antennae of the honeybee, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  P A. Moore; B A. Price; R W.S. Schneider
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.354

7.  Antennule morphology and flicking kinematics facilitate odor sampling by the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus.

Authors:  Matthew A Reidenbach; Nicole George; M A R Koehl
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Dine or dash? Turbulence inhibits blue crab navigation in attractive-aversive odor plumes by altering signal structure encoded by the olfactory pathway.

Authors:  Marc Weissburg; Lorin Atkins; Kimberly Berkenkamp; Danielle Mankin
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Sniffing by a silkworm moth: wing fanning enhances air penetration through and pheromone interception by antennae.

Authors:  C Loudon; M A Koehl
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Two sniffing strategies in palinurid lobsters.

Authors:  J A Goldman; S N Patek
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  3 in total

1.  Insect pectinate antennae maximize odor capture efficiency at intermediate flight speeds.

Authors:  Mourad Jaffar-Bandjee; Thomas Steinmann; Gijs Krijnen; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Uncertainty quantification reveals the physical constraints on pumping by peristaltic hearts.

Authors:  Lindsay D Waldrop; Yanyan He; Nicholas A Battista; Tess Neary Peterman; Laura A Miller
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Leakiness and flow capture ratio of insect pectinate antennae.

Authors:  Mourad Jaffar-Bandjee; Thomas Steinmann; Gijs Krijnen; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.118

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.