Literature DB >> 9316399

Mechanotransduction in bone: osteoblasts are more responsive to fluid forces than mechanical strain.

I Owan1, D B Burr, C H Turner, J Qiu, Y Tu, J E Onyia, R L Duncan.   

Abstract

Mechanical force applied to bone produces two localized mechanical signals on the cell: deformation of the extracellular matrix (substrate strain) and extracellular fluid flow. To study the effects of these stimuli on osteoblasts, MC3T3-E1 cells were grown on type I collagen-coated plastic plates and subjected to four-point bending. This technique produces uniform levels of physiological strain and fluid forces on the cells. Each of these parameters can be varied independently. Osteopontin (OPN) mRNA expression was used to assess the anabolic response of MC3T3-E1 cells. When fluid forces were low, neither strain magnitude nor strain rate was correlated with OPN expression. However, higher-magnitude fluid forces significantly increased OPN message levels independently of the strain magnitude or rate. These data indicate that fluid forces, and not mechanical stretch, influence OPN expression in osteoblasts and suggest that fluid forces induced by extracellular fluid flow within the bone matrix may play an important role in bone formation in response to mechanical loading.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Musculoskeletal; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9316399     DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.1997.273.3.C810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  86 in total

Review 1.  How do tissues respond and adapt to stresses around a prosthesis? A primer on finite element stress analysis for orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Richard A Brand; Clark M Stanford; Colby C Swan
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2003

2.  Mineralized matrix deposition by marrow stromal osteoblasts in 3D perfusion culture increases with increasing fluid shear forces.

Authors:  Vassilios I Sikavitsas; Gregory N Bancroft; Heidi L Holtorf; John A Jansen; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Determination of cellular strains by combined atomic force microscopy and finite element modeling.

Authors:  Guillaume T Charras; Mike A Horton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Effects of substrate characteristics on bone cell response to the mechanical environment.

Authors:  Y Yang; J Magnay; L Cooling; J J Cooper; A J El Haj
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Mechanical stretch inhibits adipogenesis and stimulates osteogenesis of adipose stem cells.

Authors:  X Yang; X Cai; J Wang; H Tang; Q Yuan; P Gong; Y Lin
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 6.831

6.  Strain amplification in bone mechanobiology: a computational investigation of the in vivo mechanics of osteocytes.

Authors:  Stefaan W Verbruggen; Ted J Vaughan; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Preclinical models for in vitro mechanical loading of bone-derived cells.

Authors:  Robin Michael Delaine-Smith; Behzad Javaheri; Jennifer Helen Edwards; Marisol Vazquez; Robin Mark Howard Rumney
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-08-19

8.  Calcium response in bone cells at different osteogenic stages under unidirectional or oscillatory flow.

Authors:  Shurong Wang; Shuna Li; Man Hu; Bo Huo
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.800

9.  Effects of artificial gravity during bed rest on bone metabolism in humans.

Authors:  S M Smith; S R Zwart; M A Heer; N Baecker; H J Evans; A H Feiveson; L C Shackelford; A D Leblanc
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-12-12

Review 10.  Biomimetic approach to tissue engineering.

Authors:  Warren L Grayson; Timothy P Martens; George M Eng; Milica Radisic; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 7.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.