Literature DB >> 14575244

How do tissues respond and adapt to stresses around a prosthesis? A primer on finite element stress analysis for orthopaedic surgeons.

Richard A Brand1, Clark M Stanford, Colby C Swan.   

Abstract

Joint implant design clearly affects long-term outcome. While many implant designs have been empirically-based, finite element analysis has the potential to identify beneficial and deleterious features prior to clinical trials. Finite element analysis is a powerful analytic tool allowing computation of the stress and strain distribution throughout an implant construct. Whether it is useful depends upon many assumptions and details of the model. Since ultimate failure is related to biological factors in addition to mechanical, and since the mechanical causes of failure are related to load history, rather than a few loading conditions, chief among them is whether the stresses or strains under limited loading conditions relate to outcome. Newer approaches can minimize this and the many other model limitations. If the surgeon is to critically and properly interpret the results in scientific articles and sales literature, he or she must have a fundamental understanding of finite element analysis. We outline here the major capabilities of finite element analysis, as well as the assumptions and limitations.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14575244      PMCID: PMC1888390     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  45 in total

1.  Partitioning a daily mechanical stimulus into discrete loading bouts improves the osteogenic response to loading.

Authors:  A G Robling; D B Burr; C H Turner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  A unifying principle relating stress to trabecular bone morphology.

Authors:  D P Fyhrie; D R Carter
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Effect of cell growth rate and dose fractionation on chemically-induced ouabain-resistant mutations in Chinese hamster V79 cells.

Authors:  G R Lankas
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  A new method to analyse the mechanical behaviour of skeletal parts.

Authors:  W A Brekelmans; H W Poort; T J Slooff
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1972

5.  On the mathematical analysis of stress in the human femur.

Authors:  E F Rybicki; F A Simonen; E B Weis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Mechanical loading history and skeletal biology.

Authors:  D R Carter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: the first decade.

Authors:  R Huiskes; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling.

Authors:  L E Lanyon; C T Rubin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Effect of dose-rate and dose fractionation on radiation-induced hemolysis of human erythrocytes.

Authors:  R Koziczak; A Krokosz; Z Szweda-Lewandowska
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Int       Date:  1999-05

10.  Bone strength in small mammals and bipedal birds: do safety factors change with body size?

Authors:  A A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  1 in total

1.  50 years ago in CORR: Biomechanics of hip prostheses. Duncan C. McKeever, MD CORR 1961;19:187-199.

Authors:  Richard A Brand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 4.176

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.