Literature DB >> 9315771

Managed care regulation: in the laboratory of the states.

T E Miller1.   

Abstract

In the wake of failed national health care system reform, the responsibility of crafting public policy to respond to changes in the health care system has fallen largely to state governments. Beginning in 1995, state policymakers focused intensively on managed care regulation, adopting policies on a broad array of issues with important implications for patients, physicians, and the physician-patient relationship. To a surprising degree, the regulatory activity in diverse health care markets across the nation has reflected a shared set of concerns about managed care practices and trends. An evaluation of the impact of these state policies will provide essential information about the most effective role for government in promoting the physician-patient relationship and the rights of patients and health care professionals in the era of managed care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Medical Association; Analytical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 1996; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9315771     DOI: 10.1001/jama.278.13.1102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  9 in total

1.  Not afraid to blame: the neglected role of blame attribution in medical consumerism and some implications for health policy.

Authors:  Marsha Rosenthal; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Voices unheard: barriers to expressing dissatisfaction to health plans.

Authors:  Mark Schlesinger; Shannon Mitchell; Brian Elbel
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  A loss of faith: the sources of reduced political legitimacy for the American medical profession.

Authors:  Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Impacts of managed care patient protection laws on health services utilization and patient satisfaction with care.

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; John R Rattliff; Mark A Hall
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Laws requiring health plans to provide direct access to obstetricians and gynecologists, and use of cancer screening by women.

Authors:  Laurence C Baker; Jia Chan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Physician incentives and disclosure of payment methods to patients.

Authors:  A C Kao; A M Zaslavsky; D C Green; J P Koplan; P D Cleary
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Impact of continuity of care on mortality and health care costs: a nationwide cohort study in Korea.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Juhee Cho; Hyung Kook Yang; Jae Hyun Park; Hyejin Lee; Hyunsu Kim; Juhwan Oh; Soohee Hwang; BeLong Cho; Eliseo Guallar
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Measuring the "managedness" and covered benefits of health plans.

Authors:  D E Grembowski; P Diehr; L C Novak; A E Roussel; D P Martin; D L Patrick; B Williams; C M Ulrich
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Continuity of care: evaluating a multidisciplinary care model for people with early CKD via a nationwide population-based longitudinal study.

Authors:  Yin-Cheng Chen; Shuen-Fu Weng; Yu-Juei Hsu; Chung-Jen Wei; Chiung-Hsuan Chiu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.