Literature DB >> 9315647

Stability of patch methylation and its impact in regions of transcriptional initiation and elongation.

C L Hsieh1.   

Abstract

CpG DNA methylation has previously been correlated with the suppression of transcription. The mechanism of this suppression is not understood, and many aspects of the temporal and positional relationships between the region of methylation and transcription have not yet been defined. Here, 12-kb stable replicating episomes that can be maintained in human somatic cells for weeks to months were used. Such a system allows more direct manipulation and is free from the positional effects attendant with the analysis of endogenous loci or integrated transgenes. By using these circular minichromosomes, patches of CpG methylation were created to include or exclude the regions of transcriptional initiation and elongation. I found that a 0.5-kb patch of methylation that covered the promoter suppressed expression only 2-fold and that a 1.9-kb patch of methylation that covered the coding portion of the gene (but not the promoter) suppressed expression about 10-fold. In contrast, methylation of the entire minichromosome except for the promoter or the coding portion suppressed transcription about 50- to 200-fold. I infer the following. Methylation of the 0.5-kb promoter fragment does not significantly affect transcription at the level of transcription factor binding or local chromatin structure. The dominant effect on transcription occurs when the length of methylated DNA is long, with little disproportionate effect of methylation of specific regions, such as that of initiation or elongation. I also found that the boundaries between these methylated and unmethylated regions remained stable for the many weeks that I monitored them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9315647      PMCID: PMC232437          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.17.10.5897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  27 in total

1.  The repressor MDBP-2 is a member of the histone H1 family that binds preferentially in vitro and in vivo to methylated nonspecific DNA sequences.

Authors:  J P Jost; J Hofsteenge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A targeting sequence directs DNA methyltransferase to sites of DNA replication in mammalian nuclei.

Authors:  H Leonhardt; A W Page; H U Weier; T H Bestor
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-11-27       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Myoblast diversity in skeletal myogenesis: how much and to what end?

Authors:  J B Miller
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-04-03       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Dependence of transcriptional repression on CpG methylation density.

Authors:  C L Hsieh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Inactive chromatin spreads from a focus of methylation.

Authors:  S U Kass; J P Goddard; R L Adams
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Replication-coupled chromatin assembly is required for the repression of basal transcription in vivo.

Authors:  G Almouzni; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 7.  DNA methylation, chromatin structure and the regulation of gene expression.

Authors:  M Graessmann; A Graessmann
Journal:  EXS       Date:  1993

Review 8.  DNA methyltransferases.

Authors:  T H Bestor; G L Verdine
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 8.382

9.  Influence of CpG methylation and target spacing on V(D)J recombination in a transgenic substrate.

Authors:  P Engler; A Weng; U Storb
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  CpG methylated minichromosomes become inaccessible for V(D)J recombination after undergoing replication.

Authors:  C L Hsieh; M R Lieber
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  32 in total

1.  Roles of cell division and gene transcription in the methylation of CpG islands.

Authors:  C M Bender; M L Gonzalgo; F A Gonzales; C T Nguyen; K D Robertson; P A Jones
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  In vivo activity of murine de novo methyltransferases, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b.

Authors:  C L Hsieh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Molecular mechanisms of gene silencing mediated by DNA methylation.

Authors:  Michela Curradi; Annalisa Izzo; Gianfranco Badaracco; Nicoletta Landsberger
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  DNA methylation has a local effect on transcription and histone acetylation.

Authors:  Ryan A Irvine; Iping G Lin; Chih-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  DNA methylation dictates histone H3K4 methylation.

Authors:  Cindy Yen Okitsu; Chih-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Preferential epigenetic suppression of the autonomous MusD over the nonautonomous ETn mouse retrotransposons.

Authors:  Irina A Maksakova; Ying Zhang; Dixie L Mager
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Interplay between DNA methylation and transcription factor availability: implications for developmental activation of the mouse Myogenin gene.

Authors:  Daniela Palacios; Dennis Summerbell; Peter W J Rigby; Joan Boyes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  FXR silencing in human colon cancer by DNA methylation and KRAS signaling.

Authors:  Ann M Bailey; Le Zhan; Dipen Maru; Imad Shureiqi; Curtis R Pickering; Galina Kiriakova; Julie Izzo; Nan He; Caimiao Wei; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Han Liang; Scott Kopetz; Garth Powis; Grace L Guo
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.052

9.  Evidence that protein binding specifies sites of DNA demethylation.

Authors:  C L Hsieh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Low salinity affects cellularity, DNA methylation, and mRNA expression of igf1 in the liver of half smooth tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis).

Authors:  Siping Li; Feng He; Haishen Wen; Jifang Li; Yufeng Si; Mingyuan Liu; Yajuan Huang; Lingcai Meng
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.794

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.