AIM: To determine the prevalence of nosocomial infection in Auckland Healthcare hospitals. BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infections cause patient morbidity and prolong hospital stay. Reporting surveillance results to staff has been shown to reduce nosocomial infection rates. METHOD: Point prevalence study for all patients in Auckland, Green Lane and National Women's hospitals. Standard definitions for nosocomial infections were used. RESULTS: One hundred and ten (12%) of 932 patients had 129 nosocomial infections: 27 (20%) surgical site infections; 25 (19%) lower respiratory tract infections; 23 (18%) skin/ soft tissue infections; 19 (15%) urinary tract infections; 14 (11%) bloodstream infections; and 21 (17%) other infections. Predominant organisms were: Staphylococcus aureus (29%), Escherichia coli (21%), other gram negative bacilli (14%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6%), streptococci (6%) and Candida albicans (6%). The prevalence of nosocomial infection was lower in National Women's Hospital (5%) than either Green Lane or Auckland hospitals (15% and 14% respectively), p < 0.01. The prevalence of nosocomial infection was the same in medical and surgical patients, 53 of 394 (14%) and 42 of 297 (14%), respectively. The highest prevalence was in intensive care unit patients, 7 of 31 (23%). The prevalence of nosocomial infection increased with patient age, 17-50 yr (8%) vs > 50 yr (14%), p < 0.01, and duration of hospitalisation 2% for < 2 days, 6% for 2-7 days vs 22% for > 7 days, p < 0.01. Risk factors for nosocomial infection were present in many patients: 339 (36%) had intravenous catheters in place; 268 (29%) patients had undergone surgery during their current admission; 122 (13%) had urinary catheters in place; and 122 (13%) had other invasive devices in situ. CONCLUSION: Our results are comparable with hospitals of similar size overseas. This study provides a base line for future studies which will enable the monitoring of trends over time and the impact of focused infection control initiatives.
AIM: To determine the prevalence of nosocomial infection in Auckland Healthcare hospitals. BACKGROUND:Nosocomial infections cause patient morbidity and prolong hospital stay. Reporting surveillance results to staff has been shown to reduce nosocomial infection rates. METHOD: Point prevalence study for all patients in Auckland, Green Lane and National Women's hospitals. Standard definitions for nosocomial infections were used. RESULTS: One hundred and ten (12%) of 932 patients had 129 nosocomial infections: 27 (20%) surgical site infections; 25 (19%) lower respiratory tract infections; 23 (18%) skin/ soft tissue infections; 19 (15%) urinary tract infections; 14 (11%) bloodstream infections; and 21 (17%) other infections. Predominant organisms were: Staphylococcus aureus (29%), Escherichia coli (21%), other gram negative bacilli (14%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6%), streptococci (6%) and Candida albicans (6%). The prevalence of nosocomial infection was lower in National Women's Hospital (5%) than either Green Lane or Auckland hospitals (15% and 14% respectively), p < 0.01. The prevalence of nosocomial infection was the same in medical and surgical patients, 53 of 394 (14%) and 42 of 297 (14%), respectively. The highest prevalence was in intensive care unit patients, 7 of 31 (23%). The prevalence of nosocomial infection increased with patient age, 17-50 yr (8%) vs > 50 yr (14%), p < 0.01, and duration of hospitalisation 2% for < 2 days, 6% for 2-7 days vs 22% for > 7 days, p < 0.01. Risk factors for nosocomial infection were present in many patients: 339 (36%) had intravenous catheters in place; 268 (29%) patients had undergone surgery during their current admission; 122 (13%) had urinary catheters in place; and 122 (13%) had other invasive devices in situ. CONCLUSION: Our results are comparable with hospitals of similar size overseas. This study provides a base line for future studies which will enable the monitoring of trends over time and the impact of focused infection control initiatives.