Literature DB >> 9314934

Patient noncompliance after vasectomy.

T J Maatman1, L Aldrin, G G Carothers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the postoperative instruction compliance rate in men undergoing bilateral vasectomy.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Private practice urological office. PATIENT(S): The records of all patients undergoing vasectomy were reviewed to determine the rate of compliance with postvasectomy follow-up instructions. It is our policy to have the patient continue to use some form of birth control until he achieves two consecutive negative semen analyses 1 month apart. In addition, we recommend a yearly semen analysis after achieving sterility to screen for the rare patient who recanalizes. Postvasectomy follow-up instructions are given to the patient both verbally and in writing. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The records of 1,892 consecutive patients undergoing vasectomy were reviewed, and the results of semen analyses were noted to determine the rate of compliance with postvasectomy follow-up instructions. RESULT(S): Six hundred forty-four men (34%) never returned after vasectomy and, therefore, no semen analyses were available for examination. Six hundred nineteen men (33%) returned for a single semen analysis. Six hundred twenty-nine men (33%) returned for a second negative semen analysis. Only 60 men (3%) completed postvasectomy follow-up instructions and returned for a yearly semen analysis. CONCLUSION(S): The rate of compliance with postvasectomy follow-up instructions for determining sterility is poor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Behavior; Contraception; Contraception Failure; Contraceptive Usage; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Male Sterilization; North America; Northern America; Postoperative Procedures; Research Methodology; Research Report; Retrospective Studies; Sterilization, Sexual; Studies; Surgery; Treatment; United States; User Compliance; Vasectomy

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9314934     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00251-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

1.  Post vasectomy analysis: call for a uniform evidence-based protocol.

Authors:  K A Sivardeen; M Budhoo
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Microfluidics for sperm analysis and selection.

Authors:  Reza Nosrati; Percival J Graham; Biao Zhang; Jason Riordon; Alexander Lagunov; Thomas G Hannam; Carlos Escobedo; Keith Jarvi; David Sinton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Reasons for not completing postvasectomy semen analysis.

Authors:  Jared Diederichs; Patrick McMahon; Johnathan Tomas; A J Muller
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Impact of the 2012 American Urological Association vasectomy guidelines on post-vasectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Robert M Coward; Niraj G Badhiwala; Jason R Kovac; Ryan P Smith; Dolores J Lamb; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Clinical and consumer trial performance of a sensitive immunodiagnostic home test that qualitatively detects low concentrations of sperm following vasectomy.

Authors:  Kenneth L Klotz; Michael A Coppola; Michel Labrecque; Victor M Brugh; Kim Ramsey; Kyung-ah Kim; Mark R Conaway; Stuart S Howards; Charles J Flickinger; John C Herr
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Microfluidic-based sperm sorting & analysis for treatment of male infertility.

Authors:  Raheel Samuel; Haidong Feng; Alex Jafek; Dillon Despain; Timothy Jenkins; Bruce Gale
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-07

7.  Do I need to see a urologist for my vasectomy? A comparison of practice patterns between urologists and family medicine physicians.

Authors:  Natasza M Posielski; Daniel D Shapiro; Xing Wang; Brian V Le
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Vasectomy: A simple snip?

Authors:  Nivedita Bhatta Dhar; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-01

9.  Prospective comparison of ligation and bipolar cautery technique in non-scalpel vasectomy.

Authors:  Muammer Altok; Ali Feyzullah Şahin; Rauf Taner Divrik; Umit Yildirim; Ferruh Zorlu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.