Literature DB >> 31515326

Reasons for not completing postvasectomy semen analysis.

Jared Diederichs1, Patrick McMahon1, Johnathan Tomas1, A J Muller2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify noncompliance rates for 3-month postvasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) in men who have undergone vasectomy and to explore the self-reported reasons for not completing the 3-month PVSA.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review followed by semistructured telephone interviews.
SETTING: Two family medicine clinics in Saskatoon, Sask. PARTICIPANTS: Men from the clinics who had undergone vasectomy since 2009. A total of 99 patients completed telephone interviews.
METHODS: After a review of electronic medical records at 2 family medicine clinics, patients who had undergone vasectomy since 2009 were identified. Upon review of their charts, the number of patients who did not have PVSA results on file was determined. Some of these men were contacted with a predetermined telephone script to discuss reasons for noncompliance. MAIN
FINDINGS: The combined noncompliance rate for the 2 clinics was high (60.5%). Three main reasons for not completing the PVSA were identified among the patient responses. These included patients feeling too busy to complete PVSA, patients feeling confident in the physician or procedure immediately after vasectomy, and patients feeling the PVSA process was too inconvenient. Our high noncompliance rates are consistent with other literature. However, the findings might also have been affected by the proportion of patients who had completed their PVSA who were not included in the telephone sample. Rates differed between the 2 clinics; the clinic with the higher compliance rate acts as an academic practice, with more time for appointments and fewer patients being referred from other physicians.
CONCLUSION: Noncompliance rates for PVSA in this study were high. Three main reasons for noncompliance were identified that might help guide counseling opportunities in the future. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31515326      PMCID: PMC6741811     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  15 in total

1.  How reliable is a vasectomy? Long-term follow-up of vasectomised men.

Authors:  N Haldar; D Cranston; E Turner; I MacKenzie; J Guillebaud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Vasectomy: a "seminal" analysis.

Authors:  Gerald A Amundsen; Kalyanakrishnan Ramakrishnan
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.954

3.  Pregnancy rates after vasectomy: a survey of US urologists.

Authors:  Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Erum Kahn; Hanif Nazerali; David C Sokal
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Vasectomy follow-up: clinical significance of rare nonmotile sperm in postoperative semen analysis.

Authors:  Ashis Chawla; Ben Bowles; Armand Zini
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Clearance after vasectomy: has the time come to modify the current practice?

Authors:  Kaka Hama Attar; Pratik Gurung; Simon Holden; John Peters; Tim Philp
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-04

6.  Semen analysis after vasectomy: when and how many?

Authors:  C Badrakumar; N K Gogoi; S K Sundaram
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 7.  Vasectomy.

Authors:  W H Weiske
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.775

8.  Postvasectomy semen analysis: are men following up?

Authors:  Ronald E Christensen; Dalton C Maples
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

9.  A prospective evaluation of the impact of scheduled follow-up appointments with compliance rates after vasectomy.

Authors:  Nivedita Bhatta Dhar; J Stephen Jones; Amit Bhatt; Denize Babineau
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Clearance after vasectomy with a single semen sample containing < than 100 000 immotile sperm/mL: analysis of 1073 patients.

Authors:  Ruben A Korthorst; Dimitri Consten; J Herman van Roijen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.