Literature DB >> 9313730

The value of lumbar spine MRI in the assessment of the pars interarticularis.

A Saifuddin1, S J Burnett.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the ability of conventional lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to demonstrate the pars interarticularis. The right and left L4 and L5 pars in 50 patients undergoing lumbar spine MRI for low back pain, with or without radiculopathy, were assessed and classified into four types. Based on their appearance, 59 (29.5%) were classified as normal (Type 1), 59 (29.5%) as hypointense (Type 2), 53 (26.5%) could not be demonstrated (Type 3) and 29 (14.5%) were thought to have defects (Type 4). The gold standard was set by the consensus opinion of two consultant musculoskeletal radiologists on the available plain radiographs of the lumbar spine. MRI was found to have a sensitivity of 57% to 86%, specificity of 81% to 82%, positive predictive value of 14% to 18% and negative predictive value of 97% to 99% for the diagnosis of a pars defect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9313730     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80029-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  15 in total

1.  Radiology rounds. Bilateral spondylolysis at L5 with associated spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  M K McLennan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Low back pain in a competitive cricket athlete.

Authors:  Justin Merlino; Jack Perisa
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-02

Review 3.  Lumbar spondylolysis: a review.

Authors:  Antonio Leone; Alessandro Cianfoni; Alfonso Cerase; Nicola Magarelli; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging for direct visualization of lumbar pars defect in children and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amira Dhouib; Anne Tabard-Fougere; Sylviane Hanquinet; Romain Dayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Juvenile spondylolysis: a comparative analysis of CT, SPECT and MRI.

Authors:  R S D Campbell; A J Grainger; I G Hide; S Papastefanou; C G Greenough
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Radiological findings and healing patterns of incomplete stress fractures of the pars interarticularis.

Authors:  Andrew J Dunn; Robert S D Campbell; Peter E Mayor; Dai Rees
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The value of combining single photon emission computerised tomography and computerised tomography in the investigation of spondylolysis.

Authors:  P L Gregory; M E Batt; R W Kerslake; B E Scammell; J F Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Imaging of back pain in children.

Authors:  D P Rodriguez; T Y Poussaint
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Epidural fat interposition between dura mater and spinous process: a new sign for the diagnosis of spondylolysis on MR imaging of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Hanan Sherif; Ahmed-Emad Mahfouz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Disc space-targeted angled axial MR images of the lumbar spine: a potential source of diagnostic error.

Authors:  Kush Singh; Clyde A Helms; David Fiorella; Nancy A Major
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.