Amira Dhouib1, Anne Tabard-Fougere2, Sylviane Hanquinet1, Romain Dayer3. 1. Pediatric Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 2. Service of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Department of Child and Adolescent, University Hospitals of Geneva, 6 Rue Willy Donzé, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland. anne.tabard@hcuge.ch. 3. Service of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Department of Child and Adolescent, University Hospitals of Geneva, 6 Rue Willy Donzé, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The accurate diagnosis of spondylolysis is widely made with CT scan considered as the gold standard. However, CT represents significant radiation exposure particularly substantial in a young and sometimes still growing population. Although the role of MRI in identifying edema/inflammation within the pars as an active lesion is proved, its ability to demonstrate and classify pars fracture line as same as CT is still controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to determine sensitivity and specificity of MRI in the direct visualisation of the pars defect. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for relevant studies from the earliest researchable time to December 2016 for cases in which the accuracy of MRI was reported for the diagnosis of spondylolysis in young patients. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality for each selected study using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 tool. A meta-analysis of the reported sensitivity and specificity of pooled data of selected studies was performed by a systematic review. For each selected study, sensitivity and specificity was recalculated, by considering only direct visualisation of a fracture line of the pars. The hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to estimate the diagnostic performance of MR imaging. Heterogeneity was also tested. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 4 out of a total of 1300 studies to be included in the meta-analysis. On a per-pars basis (a total of 1122 pars), the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the MRI for the direct diagnosis of a pars defect were 81% (95% CI 54-94%) and 99% (95% CI 98-100%), respectively. A high overall heterogeneity (I2 = 79.5%) was computed with respective high and low heterogeneity on sensitivity (I2 = 87.9%) and specificity (I2 = 38.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated a high diagnostic performance of MR imaging for the diagnosis of a pars defect in young adults. This technique may be considered as a first-line imaging technique as it helps to avoid exposure to ionising radiation.
PURPOSE: The accurate diagnosis of spondylolysis is widely made with CT scan considered as the gold standard. However, CT represents significant radiation exposure particularly substantial in a young and sometimes still growing population. Although the role of MRI in identifying edema/inflammation within the pars as an active lesion is proved, its ability to demonstrate and classify pars fracture line as same as CT is still controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to determine sensitivity and specificity of MRI in the direct visualisation of the pars defect. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for relevant studies from the earliest researchable time to December 2016 for cases in which the accuracy of MRI was reported for the diagnosis of spondylolysis in young patients. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality for each selected study using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 tool. A meta-analysis of the reported sensitivity and specificity of pooled data of selected studies was performed by a systematic review. For each selected study, sensitivity and specificity was recalculated, by considering only direct visualisation of a fracture line of the pars. The hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to estimate the diagnostic performance of MR imaging. Heterogeneity was also tested. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 4 out of a total of 1300 studies to be included in the meta-analysis. On a per-pars basis (a total of 1122 pars), the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the MRI for the direct diagnosis of a pars defect were 81% (95% CI 54-94%) and 99% (95% CI 98-100%), respectively. A high overall heterogeneity (I2 = 79.5%) was computed with respective high and low heterogeneity on sensitivity (I2 = 87.9%) and specificity (I2 = 38.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated a high diagnostic performance of MR imaging for the diagnosis of a pars defect in young adults. This technique may be considered as a first-line imaging technique as it helps to avoid exposure to ionising radiation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diagnostic accuracy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Spondylolysis; Systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Jeremy K Rush; Nelson Astur; Stephanie Scott; Derek M Kelly; Jeffrey R Sawyer; William C Warner Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2015 Apr-May Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: Penny F Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Marie E Westwood; Susan Mallett; Jonathan J Deeks; Johannes B Reitsma; Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan A C Sterne; Patrick M M Bossuyt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Tim Finkenstaedt; Palanan Siriwanarangsun; Suraj Achar; Michael Carl; Sina Finkenstaedt; Nirusha Abeydeera; Christine B Chung; Won C Bae Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini; Yì Xiáng J Wáng; José Pablo Martínez Barbero; Jade García Espinosa; Alberto Martínez Martínez Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2022-07
Authors: Roy Esh; Linn Helen J Grødahl; Robert Kerslake; Kate Strachan; Simon Spencer; Louise Fawcett; Alison Rushton; Nicola R Heneghan Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2020-10-02