Literature DB >> 9313274

Comparative efficacy of patient-controlled administration of morphine, hydromorphone, or sufentanil for the treatment of oral mucositis pain following bone marrow transplantation.

B A Coda1, B O'Sullivan, G Donaldson, S Bohl, C R Chapman, D D Shen.   

Abstract

A total of 119 bone marrow transplant patients suffering from oral mucositis pain were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial comparing the efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, hydromorphone and sufentanil. Patient ratings of pain and side-effects on visual analog scales were gathered daily from the start of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) therapy until the discontinuation of opioid treatment either because of resolution of oral mucositis pain, intolerable side-effects, inadequate pain control, or complications related to transplantation. Of the 119 enrolled subjects, 100 met the evaluable criteria of developing oral mucositis and remaining on the study for at least 2 days. Multivariate analysis of the outcome measures indicated that the analgesia achieved in all three opioid groups was nearly equivalent, while measures of side-effects, especially for the combination of sedation, sleep and mood disturbances, were statistically lower in the morphine group than in hydromorphone or sufentanil groups. Patients in the hydromorphone group exhibited the most variability in pain control. Event analysis also indicated significant differences in time to treatment failure between the three groups, with the morphine arm exhibiting clear superiority. The proportion of patients discontinued because of inadequate pain relief was much higher in the sufentanil group (7/36) as compared to the hydromorphone (0/34) or the morphine group (1/30). The daily opioid consumption pattern showed a continual dose escalation during the first week of therapy for all groups, coincident with worsening mucositis. Morphine consumption reached a plateau by day 5, whereas hydromorphone and sufentanil consumption continued to rise until days 7 and 9, respectively. Sufentanil dose requirement increased by approximately 10-fold compared to morphine and hydromorphone, whose requirements increased only 5-fold, suggesting the possibility of development of acute pharmacological tolerance in some patients with this phenylpiperidine opioid. This study provides support for the recommendation that morphine is the opioid of first choice when patient-controlled analgesia is employed for the treatment of severe oropharyngeal pain in bone marrow transplantation (BMT) patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9313274     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00059-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  13 in total

Review 1.  Patient-controlled analgesia: an appropriate method of pain control in children.

Authors:  A J McDonald; M G Cooper
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Nausea and vomiting after surgery under general anesthesia: an evidence-based review concerning risk assessment, prevention, and treatment.

Authors:  Dirk Rüsch; Leopold H J Eberhart; Jan Wallenborn; Peter Kranke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment.

Authors:  Jan E Clarkson; Helen V Worthington; Susan Furness; Martin McCabe; Tasneem Khalid; Stefan Meyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

4.  Safety and efficacy of fentanyl administered by patient controlled analgesia in children with cancer pain.

Authors:  A Ruggiero; G Barone; L Liotti; A Chiaretti; I Lazzareschi; R Riccardi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Systematic review of antimicrobials, mucosal coating agents, anesthetics, and analgesics for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients.

Authors:  Deborah P Saunders; Joel B Epstein; Sharon Elad; Justin Allemano; Paolo Bossi; Marianne D van de Wetering; Nikhil G Rao; Carin Potting; Karis K Cheng; Annette Freidank; Michael T Brennan; Joanne Bowen; Kristopher Dennis; Rajesh V Lalla
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Mitigating acute chemotherapy-associated adverse events in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; Aakash Desai; Maryam B Lustberg; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 65.011

7.  Patient-reported outcomes and the mandate of measurement.

Authors:  Gary Donaldson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Tolerability and effects of two formulations of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC; ACTIQ) in patients with radiation-induced oral mucositis.

Authors:  Lauren Shaiova; Jeanne Lapin; Lorraine S Manco; Daniel Shasha; Kenneth Hu; Louis Harrison; Russell K Portenoy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Patient-controlled analgesia with fentanil and midazolam in children with postoperative neurosurgical pain.

Authors:  Antonio Chiaretti; Orazio Genovese; Alessia Antonelli; Luca Tortorolo; Antonio Ruggiero; Benedetta Focarelli; Concezio Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Novel Use of Hydromorphone as a Pretreatment Agent: A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Study in Adult Korean Surgical Patients.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Lee; Chul Joong Lee; Tae Hyeong Kim; Byung Seop Shin; Suk Young Lee; Eun Young Joo; Woo Seog Sim
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2011-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.