Literature DB >> 9310003

Impact of positive end-expiratory pressure on chest wall and lung pressure-volume curve in acute respiratory failure.

M Mergoni1, A Martelli, A Volpi, S Primavera, P Zuccoli, A Rossi.   

Abstract

To investigate whether chest-wall mechanics could affect the total respiratory system pressure-volume (P-V) curve in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), and particularly the lower inflection point (LIP) of the curve, we drew the total respiratory system, lung, and chest-wall P-V curves (P-Vrs, P-VL, and P-VW, respectively) for 13 patients with ARF, using the supersyringe method together with the esophageal balloon technique. Measurements were randomly repeated at four different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (0, 5, 10, 15 cm H2O) and from each P-V curve we derived starting compliance (Cstart), inflation compliance (Cinf), and end compliance (Cend). With PEEP of 0 cm H2O (ZEEP), an LIP on the P-Vrs curve was observed in all patients (7.5 +/- 3.9 cm H2O); in two patients an LIP was detected only on the P-VL curve (8.6 and 8.7 cm H2O, respectively); whereas in seven patients an LIP was observed only on the P-VW curve (3.4 +/- 1.1 cm H2O). In four patients, an LIP was detected on both the P-VL and P-VW curves (8.5 +/- 3.4 and 2.2 +/- 1.0 cm H2O, respectively). The LIP was abolished by PEEP, suggesting that a volume-related mechanism was responsible for the observed LIP on both the P-VL and P-VW curves. At high levels of PEEP, an upper inflection point (UIP) appeared on the P-Vrs and P-VL curves (11.7 +/- 4.9 cm H2O and 8.9 +/- 4.2 cm H2O above PEEP, respectively) suggesting alveolar overdistension. In general, PaO2 increased with PEEP (from 81.7 +/- 35.5 mm Hg on ZEEP to 120 +/- 43.8 mm Hg on PEEP 15 cm H2O, p < 0.002); however, the increase in PaO2 with PEEP was significant only in patients with an LIP on the P-VL curve (from 70.5 +/- 16.2 mm Hg to 117.5 +/- 50.7 mm Hg, p < 0.002), the changes in PaO2 in patients without an LIP on the P-VL curve not being significant (from 91.3 +/- 45.4 mm Hg to 122.2 +/- 41.1 mm Hg). We conclude that in ventilator-dependent patients with ARF: (1) the chest-wall mechanics can contribute to the LIP observed on the P-Vrs curve; (2) the improvement in PaO2 with PEEP is significant only in patients in whom LIP is on the lung P-V curve and not on the chest wall curve; (3) high levels of PEEP may overdistend the lung, as reflected by the appearance of a UIP; (4) measurement of P-Vrs alone may be misleading as a guide for setting the level of PEEP in some mechanically ventilated patients, at least in the supine position, although it helps to prevent excessive alveolar overdistension by indicating the inflection volume above which UIP may appear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9310003     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.3.9607040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  17 in total

1.  ECMO criteria for influenza A (H1N1)-associated ARDS: role of transpulmonary pressure.

Authors:  Salvatore Grasso; Pierpaolo Terragni; Alberto Birocco; Rosario Urbino; Lorenzo Del Sorbo; Claudia Filippini; Luciana Mascia; Antonio Pesenti; Alberto Zangrillo; Luciano Gattinoni; V Marco Ranieri
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Point: should positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with ARDS be set on oxygenation? Yes.

Authors:  Russell R Miller; Neil R MacIntyre; R Duncan Hite; Jonathon D Truwit; Roy G Brower; Alan H Morris
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Respiratory system dynamical mechanical properties: modeling in time and frequency domain.

Authors:  Alysson Roncally Carvalho; Walter Araujo Zin
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2011-05-19

4.  Pneumoperitoneum deteriorates intratidal respiratory system mechanics: an observational study in lung-healthy patients.

Authors:  Steffen Wirth; Andreas Biesemann; Johannes Spaeth; Stefan Schumann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Static pressure volume curves and body posture in acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Spyros D Mentzelopoulos; Charis Roussos; Spyros G Zakynthinos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Non-invasive over-distension measurements: data driven vs model-based.

Authors:  Qianhui Sun; J Geoffrey Chase; Cong Zhou; Merryn H Tawhai; Jennifer L Knopp; Knut Möller; Geoffrey M Shaw
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 1.977

7.  Esophageal pressures in acute lung injury: do they represent artifact or useful information about transpulmonary pressure, chest wall mechanics, and lung stress?

Authors:  Stephen H Loring; Carl R O'Donnell; Negin Behazin; Atul Malhotra; Todd Sarge; Ray Ritz; Victor Novack; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-12-17

8.  Differences in the deflation limb of the pressure-volume curves in acute respiratory distress syndrome from pulmonary and extrapulmonary origin.

Authors:  Guillermo M Albaiceta; Francisco Taboada; Diego Parra; Armando Blanco; Dolores Escudero; Jesús Otero
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Controlling mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome with fuzzy logic.

Authors:  Binh Nguyen; David B Bernstein; Jason H T Bates
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.425

10.  Elucidating the fuzziness in physician decision making in ARDS.

Authors:  David B Bernstein; Binh Nguyen; Gilman B Allen; Jason H T Bates
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.